THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INSTRUMENT FOR A TECHNOLOGY-INTEGRATED SCIENCE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT

被引:14
作者
Wu, Weishen [1 ]
Chang, Huey-Por [2 ]
Guo, Chorng-Jee [3 ]
机构
[1] Da Yeh Univ, Dept Informat Management, Changhua 515, Taiwan
[2] Natl Changhua Univ Educ, Dept Phys, Changhua 500, Taiwan
[3] Natl Taitung Univ, Dept Nat Sci Educ, Taitung 950, Taiwan
关键词
classroom climate; instrumentation; learning environment; science teaching; technology integration; MOTIVATION; PERCEPTIONS; RELIABILITY; REVERSALS;
D O I
10.1007/s10763-007-9116-5
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
This study developed, validated, and utilized the Technology Integrated Classroom Inventory (TICI) to examine technology-integrated science learning environments as perceived by secondary school students and teachers. Using technology-oriented classroom climate instruments and considering the science classroom's characteristics, TICI was developed. More than 1,100 seventh through ninth grade science students validated the instrument, revealing eight scales: technological enrichment, inquiry learning, equity and friendliness, student cohesiveness, understanding and encouragement, competition and efficacy, audiovisual environment, and order, with alpha reliabilities ranging between 0.69 and 0.91 (0.93 for the entire questionnaire). In measuring actual and preferred learning environments, TICI results indicated that both students and teachers ranked equity and friendliness highest. The largest actual-preferred discrepancy was order (students) and inquiry learning (teachers). TICI offers additional utilities for technology-enriched science leaning environments.
引用
收藏
页码:207 / 233
页数:27
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Aldridge J.M., 2004, AUST J EDUC DEV PSYC, V4, P110
[2]   Constructivist learning environments in a cross-national study in Taiwan and Australia [J].
Aldridge, JM ;
Fraser, BJ ;
Taylor, PC ;
Chen, CC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 22 (01) :37-55
[3]  
Anderson A., 2004, LEARNING ENVIRON RES, V7, P211, DOI [10.1007/s10984-004-3292-9, DOI 10.1007/S10984-004-3292-9]
[4]  
[Anonymous], NAT SCI ED STAND
[5]  
[Anonymous], INT HDB SCI ED
[6]  
Bagozzi R. P., 1988, Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, V16, P74, DOI [10.1007/BF02723327, DOI 10.1007/BF02723327, 10.1007/Bf02723327, DOI 10.1177/009207038801600107]
[7]   Effects of stem and likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems [J].
Barnette, JJ .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (03) :361-370
[8]   Scientific arguments as learning artifacts: designing for learning from the web with KIE [J].
Bell, P ;
Linn, MC .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 2000, 22 (08) :797-817
[9]  
Bollen K. A., 1993, Testing structural equation models, DOI DOI 10.1093/SF/73.3.1161
[10]  
Bowman J. Jr., 2001, Journal of Educational Computing Research, V25, P81, DOI 10.2190/4805-KRH1-W84Q-VN6F