Debiasing through law

被引:203
作者
Jolls, C [1 ]
Sunstein, CR
机构
[1] Harvard Univ, Sch Law, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[2] Univ Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/500096
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
In many settings, human beings are boundedly rational. A distinctive and insufficiently explored legal response to bounded rationality is to attempt to debias through law by steering people in more rational directions. In many domains, existing legal analyses emphasize the alternative approach of insulating outcomes from the effects of boundedly rational behavior, which itself is taken as a given. In fact, however, many legal strategies are efforts to engage in the different approach of debiasing through law by reducing or even eliminating people's boundedly rational behavior. This paper offers a general account of how debiasing through law does or could work to address legal questions across a range of areas, from consumer safety law to corporate law to property law. Discussion is also devoted to the risks of government manipulation and overshooting that are sometimes raised when debiasing through law is employed.
引用
收藏
页码:199 / 241
页数:43
相关论文
共 81 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], HEURISTICS BIASES PS
[2]  
[Anonymous], JUDGEMENT UNCERTAINT
[3]  
[Anonymous], LAW EC IRRATIONAL BE
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, INFORM APPROACHES RE
[5]   Endowment effects within corporate agency relationships [J].
Arlen, J ;
Spitzer, M ;
Talley, E .
JOURNAL OF LEGAL STUDIES, 2002, 31 (01) :1-37
[6]  
Armor DA., 2002, Heuristics and biases: Thepsychology ofintuitivejudgment, P334, DOI 10.1017/CBO9780511808098.021
[7]   OPINIONS AND SOCIAL PRESSURE [J].
ASCH, SE .
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, 1955, 193 (05) :31-35
[8]   SOLOMONIC BARGAINING - DIVIDING A LEGAL ENTITLEMENT TO FACILITATE COASEAN TRADE [J].
AYRES, I ;
TALLEY, E .
YALE LAW JOURNAL, 1995, 104 (05) :1027-1117
[9]  
Babcock L, 1995, AM ECON REV, V85, P1337
[10]  
Babcock L, 1997, LAW SOCIAL INQUIRY, V22, P913, DOI 10.1086/492609