Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages

被引:82
作者
Göksoy, AT
Demir, AO
Turan, ZM
Dagüstü, N
机构
[1] Uludag Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Field Crops, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkey
[2] Uludag Univ, Fac Agr, Dept Agr Struct & Irrigat, TR-16059 Bursa, Turkey
关键词
sunflower; irrigation; water deficit; evapotranspiration; growth periods; yield;
D O I
10.1016/j.fcr.2003.11.004
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
This study was carried out to understand the relationships between yield and irrigation water applied at different growth periods and to determine the most critical period(s) for sunflower. A rainfed (non-irrigated) treatment as the control and 13 different irrigation treatments (H, F, M, HF, HM, FM, HFM, H60FM, H40FM, HF60M, HF40M, HFM60, HFM40) With full (about 360 min) or limited (40 and 60%) irrigation water, were applied to the hybrid Sanbro (Novartis Seed Company) planted on clay soil, at three critical development periods: heading (H), flowering (F), and milking (M). Evapotranspiration (ET) increased as an increasing amount of irrigation water was applied. The highest seasonal ET (an average of 674 mm) was measured in the HFM treatment. Limited irrigation applied at different at-owing periods had different effects on the yield-related characters examined. The highest seed yield (4056 kg ha(-1)) and oil yield (1841 kg ha(-1)) were obtained from the HFM treatment; 85.4 and 88% increases, respectively, compared with the control. The seed yield and oil yield increases for the limited-irrigation treatments were: 78.7 and 77.4% for H60FM; 77.4 and 78.9% for H40FM; 72.2 and 75% for HF60M; 76.4 and 79.2% for HF40M; 72.7 and 73.6% for HFM60; 77.6 and 79.1% for HFM40. Therefore, we confirm that HFM irrigation is the best choice for maximum yield under the local conditions, but these irrigation schemes must be re-considered in areas where water resources are more limited. In case of more restricted irrigation, the limitation of irrigation water at the flowering period should be avoided. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:167 / 178
页数:12
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   SUNFLOWER YIELD AND WATER-USE AS INFLUENCED BY PLANTING DATE, POPULATION, AND ROW SPACING [J].
ALESSI, J ;
POWER, JF ;
ZIMMERMAN, DC .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 1977, 69 (03) :465-469
[2]  
ANDHALE RK, 1978, INDIAN J MAHARASHTRA, V3, P200
[3]  
[Anonymous], BOT SYSTEM
[4]  
BEYCE OK, 1972, J CTR SOIL WATER CON
[5]  
BLACK CH, 1965, METHODS SOIL ANAL, P63, DOI DOI 10.2134/AGRONMONOGR9.1
[6]  
Bos M. G., 1980, International Commission on Irrigation and Drainage, Bulletin, V29, P18
[7]   EFFECT OF DATE OF FINAL IRRIGATION ON YIELD AND YIELD COMPONENTS OF SUNFLOWERS IN A SEMI-ARID ENVIRONMENT [J].
BROWNE, CL .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL AGRICULTURE, 1977, 17 (86) :482-488
[8]   RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER TO STRATEGIES OF IRRIGATION .2. MORPHOLOGICAL AND PHYSIOLOGICAL-RESPONSES TO WATER-STRESS [J].
CONNOR, DJ ;
JONES, TR .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1985, 12 (02) :91-103
[9]   RESPONSE OF SUNFLOWER TO STRATEGIES OF IRRIGATION .1. GROWTH, YIELD AND THE EFFICIENCY OF WATER-USE [J].
CONNOR, DJ ;
JONES, TR ;
PALTA, JA .
FIELD CROPS RESEARCH, 1985, 10 (01) :15-36
[10]  
DEMIROREN T, 1978, J TOKAT REGION SOIL