What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? a literature survey

被引:410
作者
Bornmann, Lutz [1 ]
机构
[1] Max Planck Gesell, Div Sci & Innovat Studies, Adm Headquarters, D-80539 Munich, Germany
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR INFORMATION SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY | 2013年 / 64卷 / 02期
关键词
HEALTH RESEARCH; PRODUCTIVE INTERACTIONS; PAYBACK FRAMEWORK; ACADEMIC RESEARCH; SOCIAL IMPACT; SCIENCE; PUBLICATIONS; CRITERIA; POLICY;
D O I
10.1002/asi.22803
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Since the 1990s, the scope of research evaluations becomes broader as the societal products (outputs), societal use (societal references), and societal benefits (changes in society) of research come into scope. Society can reap the benefits of successful research studies only if the results are converted into marketable and consumable products (e.g., medicaments, diagnostic tools, machines, and devices) or services. A series of different names have been introduced which refer to the societal impact of research: third stream activities, societal benefits, societal quality, usefulness, public values, knowledge transfer, and societal relevance. What most of these names are concerned with is the assessment of social, cultural, environmental, and economic returns (impact and effects) from results (research output) or products (research outcome) of publicly funded research. This review intends to present existing research on and practices employed in the assessment of societal impact in the form of a literature survey. The objective is for this review to serve as a basis for the development of robust and reliable methods of societal impact measurement.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 233
页数:17
相关论文
共 101 条
[1]   Do metrics matter? [J].
Abbott, Alison ;
Cyranoski, David ;
Jones, Nicola ;
Maher, Brendan ;
Schiermeier, Quirin ;
Van Noorden, Richard .
NATURE, 2010, 465 (7300) :860-862
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2008, Medical research: What's it worth? Estimating the economic benefits from medical research in the UK
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2007, RISING GATHERING STO
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2009, RES EXC FRAM 2 CONS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Millennium Development Goals
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2010, ASS EUR U BAS RES EX
[7]  
[Anonymous], REASSESSING SCI SOC
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Panel Criteria and Working Methods
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, EV SOC REL AC RES GU
[10]  
[Anonymous], DEC ASS RES IMP