Navigating a Rough Terrain of Public Management: Examining the Relationship between Organizational Size and Effectiveness

被引:37
作者
Jung, Chan Su [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
GOAL AMBIGUITY; STUDENT PERFORMANCE; EFFICIENCY; ENVIRONMENT; IMPROVEMENT; TECHNOLOGY; INNOVATION; POLITICS;
D O I
10.1093/jopart/mus040
中图分类号
D0 [政治学、政治理论];
学科分类号
0302 ; 030201 ;
摘要
This study examines the relationship between size and effectiveness of 97 US federal government organizations in combination with relevant mediating variables. The dependent variable, actual goal attainment, is considered as a measure of organizational effectiveness. The number of full-time employees and budget size, the independent variables, are considered as measures of organizational size. Mediating variables considered are goal ambiguity measures, the number of programs, the proportion of professionals in the organization, and institutional location (independent agencies versus agencies inside executive departments). The path analysis corroborates an inverted U-shaped relationship between the number of employees and organizational effectiveness. Furthermore, the relationship between budget size and organizational effectiveness is found to be negative and log-linear, and the relationship is partially mediated by target-specification ambiguity and timeline ambiguity.
引用
收藏
页码:663 / 686
页数:24
相关论文
共 104 条
[1]   TECHNOLOGY AND ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE - REEXAMINATION OF FINDINGS OF ASTON GROUP [J].
ALDRICH, HE .
ADMINISTRATIVE SCIENCE QUARTERLY, 1972, 17 (01) :26-43
[2]  
Andrews R., 2006, PUBLIC SERVICE PERFO, P14
[3]   Strategy Formulation, Strategy Content and Performance [J].
Andrews, Rhys ;
Boyne, George A. ;
Law, Jennifer ;
Walker, Richard M. .
PUBLIC MANAGEMENT REVIEW, 2009, 11 (01) :1-22
[4]  
[Anonymous], ORG STRUCTURES PROCE
[5]  
[Anonymous], FY 2004 BUDG CHAPT I
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1995, J PUBL ADM RES THEOR, DOI DOI 10.1093/OXFORDJOURNALS.JPART.A037245
[7]  
[Anonymous], HUMAN RELATIONS MODE
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1979, RELIABILITY VALIDITY
[9]  
[Anonymous], ANN M AM POL SCI ASS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1980, MEASURING ASSESSING