External validation of the Mayo Clinic stage, size, grade and necrosis (SSIGN) score to predict cancer specific survival using a European series of conventional renal cell carcinoma

被引:109
作者
Ficarra, V
Martignoni, G
Lohse, C
Novara, G
Pea, M
Cavalleri, S
Artibani, W
机构
[1] Univ Verona, Dept Urol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[2] Univ Verona, Dept Pathol, I-37134 Verona, Italy
[3] Mayo Clin, Div Biostat, Rochester, MN USA
关键词
kidney; kidney neoplasms; carcinoma; clear cell; renal cell; mortality;
D O I
10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00684-1
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Purpose: We validated the Mayo Clinic SSIGN score in an independent European sample of patients who were surgically treated for conventional RCC. Materials and Methods: In our kidney cancer database we identified 388 patients who were treated with radical or partial nephrectomy for conventional RCC between 1986 and 2000. Associations of the pathological features studied with death from RCC were evaluated using the log rank test and Cox proportional hazards regression model. The predictive ability of competing models was evaluated using the c index. Results: Median followup in the 290 patients who were alive at last followup was 5 years (range 5 months to 17 years). The estimated cancer specific survival rate 5 years following surgery was 81.3%. All features that comprise the SSIGN score except tumor size were significantly associated with death from RCC in a multivariate setting, resulting in a c index of 0.90. The median SSIGN score in the 388 patients studied was 3 (range 0 to 15). The c index in a model containing the clear cell SSIGN score was 0.88. Five-year cancer specific survival rates in patients with a score of 0 to 2, 3 to 4, 5 to 6, 7 to 9 and 10 or more were 100.0%, 90.5%, 63.6%, 46.8% and 0%, respectively. Conclusions: We provide the first external validation of the Mayo Clinic SSIGN score for conventional RCC. This simple algorithm resulted in a high degree of prognostic accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:1235 / 1239
页数:5
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]   Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma [J].
Cheville, JC ;
Lohse, CM ;
Zincke, H ;
Weaver, AL ;
Blute, ML .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 27 (05) :612-624
[2]   Original and reviewed nuclear grading according to the Fuhrman system - A multivariate analysis of 388 patients with conventional renal cell carcinoma [J].
Ficarra, V ;
Martignoni, G ;
Maffei, N ;
Brunelli, M ;
Novara, G ;
Zanolla, L ;
Pea, M ;
Artibani, W .
CANCER, 2005, 103 (01) :68-75
[3]   An outcome prediction model for patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma treated with radical nephrectomy based on tumor stage, size, grade and necrosis: The SSIGN score [J].
Frank, I ;
Blute, ML ;
Cheville, JC ;
Lohse, CM ;
Weaver, AL ;
Zincke, H .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2002, 168 (06) :2395-2400
[4]   PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE OF MORPHOLOGIC PARAMETERS IN RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA [J].
FUHRMAN, SA ;
LASKY, LC ;
LIMAS, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY, 1982, 6 (07) :655-663
[5]   Validation of an integrated staging system toward improved prognostication of patients with localized renal cell carcinoma in an international population [J].
Han, KR ;
Bleumer, I ;
Pantuck, AJ ;
Kim, HL ;
Dorey, FJ ;
Janzen, NK ;
Zisman, A ;
Dinney, CP ;
Wood, CG ;
Swanson, DA ;
Said, JW ;
Figlin, RA ;
Mulders, PFA ;
Belldegrun, AS .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2003, 170 (06) :2221-2224
[6]  
Harrell FE, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P361, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960229)15:4<361::AID-SIM168>3.0.CO
[7]  
2-4
[8]   A postoperative prognostic nomogram for renal cell carcinoma [J].
Kattan, MW ;
Reuter, V ;
Motzer, RJ ;
Katz, J ;
Russo, P .
JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2001, 166 (01) :63-67
[9]  
Kovacs G, 1997, J PATHOL, V183, P131, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9896(199710)183:2<131::AID-PATH931>3.0.CO
[10]  
2-G