Contrasting mediating variables in two 5-a-day nutrition intervention programs

被引:33
作者
Reynolds, KD
Bishop, DB
Chou, CP
Xie, B
Nebeling, L
Perry, CL
机构
[1] Univ So Calif, Inst Hlth Promot & Dis Prevent Res, Alhambra, CA 91803 USA
[2] Minnesota Dept Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55414 USA
[3] NCI, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
[4] Univ Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
mediators; school-based; nutrition intervention; fruit and vegetable consumption;
D O I
10.1016/j.ypmed.2004.03.022
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
Background. Researchers have advocated mediational analysis for behavioral intervention studies to link the supporting theory used in an intervention with the mediating variables and with its ultimate success or failure. Few mediational analyses have been reported for school-based nutrition studies. The conduct of mediational analyses within multi-site studies may provide advantages for the standardization of methods and for the replication and generalizability of findings. Methods. This study identified mediators of two school-based nutrition interventions for 4th graders. Three variables were tested on the four criteria necessary to establish mediation of intervention effects on changes in fruit and vegetable consumption (FVC) in 4th graders (Alabama, N = 1584; Minnesota, N = 522). FVC was measured in children using 24-h dietary recalls. Mediators were assessed using questionnaires completed by children and parents. Results. All criteria were met in Alabama for a single-item measure of knowledge of the 5-a-day daily consumption guideline. Knowledge and parent consumption satisfied one criterion in Minnesota. Knowledge accounted for 9.78% of the total intervention effect in Alabama. Conclusions. Knowledge of the 5-a-day guideline for fruit and vegetable consumption may mediate intervention effects. Future work should include tests of mediational models in multi-site studies. (C) 2004 The Institute For Cancer Prevention and Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:882 / 893
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Fam Econ Nutr Rev
[2]  
AXELSON ML, 1985, J NUTR EDUC, V17, P51
[3]   Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective [J].
Bandura, A .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :1-26
[4]  
Bandura A., 1996, SOCIAL FDN THOUGHT A
[5]   Mediating variable framework in physical activity interventions - How are we doing? How might we do better? [J].
Baranowski, T ;
Anderson, C ;
Carmack, C .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 1998, 15 (04) :266-297
[6]   Theory as mediating variables: Why aren't community interventions working as desired? [J].
Baranowski, T ;
Lin, LS ;
Wetter, DW ;
Resnicow, K ;
Hearn, MD .
ANNALS OF EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1997, 7 (07) :S89-S95
[7]  
BARANOWSKI T, 1999, ANN REV NUTR
[8]  
BARANOWSKI T, 1996, HLTH BEHAV HLTH ED, P153
[9]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[10]  
Bentler P. M., 2006, EQS 6 structural equations program manual