Characterization of phenylpropene O-methyltransferases from sweet basil:: Facile change of substrate specificity and convergent evolution within a plant O-methyltransferase family

被引:191
作者
Gang, DR [1 ]
Lavid, N
Zubieta, C
Chen, F
Beuerle, T
Lewinsohn, E
Noel, JP
Pichersky, E
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Mol Cellular & Dev Biol, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Agr Res Org, Aromat Med & Spice Crops Unit, Newe Yaar Res Ctr, IL-30095 Ramat Yishay, Israel
[3] Salk Inst Biol Studies, Struct Biol Lab, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1105/tpc.010327
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Some basil varieties are able to convert the phenylpropenes chavicol and eugenol to methylchavicol and methyleugenol, respectively. Chavicol O-methyltransferase (CVOMT) and eugenol O-methyltransferase (EOMT) cDNAs were isolated from the sweet basil variety EMX-1 using a biochemical genomics approach. These cDNAs encode proteins that are 90% identical to each other and very similar to several isoflavone O-methyltransferases such as IOMT, which catalyzes the 4'-O-methylation of 2,7,4'-trihydroxyisoflavanone. On the other hand, CVOMT1 and EOMT1 are related only distantly to (iso)eugenol OMT from Clarkia breweri, indicating that the eugenol O-methylating enzymes in basil and C. breweri evolved independently. Transcripts for CVOMT1 and EOMT1 were highly expressed in the peltate glandular trichomes on the surface of the young basil leaves. The CVOMT1 and EOMT1 cDNAs were expressed in Escherichia coli, and active proteins were produced. CVOMT1 catalyzed the O-methylation of chavicol, and EOMT1 also catalyzed the O-methylation of chavicol with equal efficiency to that of CVOMT1, but it was much more efficient in O-methylating eugenol. Molecular modeling, based on the crystal structure of IOMT, suggested that a single amino acid difference was responsible for the difference in substrate discrimination between CVOMT1 and EOMT1. This prediction was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis, in which the appropriate mutants of CVOMT1 (F260S) and EOMT1 (S261F) were produced that exhibited the opposite substrate preference relative to the respective native enzyme.
引用
收藏
页码:505 / 519
页数:15
相关论文
共 57 条
  • [1] Adams S., 1996, Journal of Essential Oil Research, V8, P535
  • [2] BRADFORD MM, 1976, ANAL BIOCHEM, V72, P248, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3
  • [3] CHATTERJEE A, 1982, J NEMATOL, V14, P118
  • [4] CHENCHIK A, 1996, RTPCR METHODS GENE C, P305
  • [5] PURIFICATION AND PROPERTIES OF THE 3 "ORTHO-DIPHENOL-O-METHYLTRANSFERASES OF TOBACCO-LEAVES
    COLLENDAVELLOO, J
    LEGRAND, M
    GEOFFROY, P
    BARTHELEMY, J
    FRITIG, B
    [J]. PHYTOCHEMISTRY, 1981, 20 (04) : 611 - 616
  • [6] Structure and evolution of linalool synthase
    Cseke, L
    Dudareva, N
    Pichersky, E
    [J]. MOLECULAR BIOLOGY AND EVOLUTION, 1998, 15 (11) : 1491 - 1498
  • [7] Molecular cloning and functional expression of O-methyltransferases common to isoquinoline alkaloid and phenylpropanoid biosynthesis
    Frick, S
    Kutchan, TM
    [J]. PLANT JOURNAL, 1999, 17 (04) : 329 - 339
  • [8] An investigation of the storage and biosynthesis of phenylpropenes in sweet basil
    Gang, DR
    Wang, JH
    Dudareva, N
    Nam, KH
    Simon, JE
    Lewinsohn, E
    Pichersky, E
    [J]. PLANT PHYSIOLOGY, 2001, 125 (02) : 539 - 555
  • [9] GILDEMEISTER E, 1913, ATHERISCHEN OLE
  • [10] Grossman J., 1993, IPM Practitioner, V15, P1