Polynomial-based disaggregation of hourly rainfall for continuous hydrologic simulation

被引:15
作者
Durrans, SR
Burian, SJ
Nix, SJ
Hajji, A
Pitt, RE
Fan, CY
Field, R
机构
[1] Univ Alabama, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Tuscaloosa, AL 35487 USA
[2] No Arizona Univ, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Flagstaff, AZ 86011 USA
[3] Ecole Natl Genie Rural Eaux & Forets, F-75732 Paris, France
[4] US EPA, Urban Watershed Management Branch, Edison, NJ 08837 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 35卷 / 05期
关键词
rainfall; time series; urban watersheds; disaggregation;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.1999.tb04208.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Hydrologic modeling of urban watersheds for designs and analyses of stormwater conveyance facilities can be performed in either an event-based or continuous fashion. Continuous simulation requires, among other things, the use of a time series of rainfall amounts. However, for urban drainage basins, which are typically small, the temporal resolution of the rainfall time series must be quite fine, and often on the order of 5 to 15 minutes. This poses a significant challenge because rainfall-gauging records are usually kept only for hourly or longer time steps. The time step sizes in stochastic rainfall generators are usually also too large for application to urban runoff modeling situations. Thus, there is a need for methods by which hourly rainfall amounts can be disaggregated to shorter time intervals. This paper presents and compares a number of approaches to this problem, which are based on the use of polynomial approximating functions. Results of these evaluations indicate that a disaggregation method presented by Ormsbee (1989) is a relatively good performer when storm durations are short (2 hours), and that a quadratic spline-based approach is a good choice for longer-duration storms. Based on these results, the Ormsbee technique is recommended because it provides good performance, and can be applied easily to long time series of precipitation records. The quadratic spline-based approach is recommended as a close second choice because it performed the best most consistently, but remains more difficult to apply than the Ormsbee technique. Results of this study also indicate that, on average, all of the disaggregation methods evaluated introduce a severe negative bias into maximum rainfall intensities. This is cause for some well-justified concern, as the characteristics of runoff hydrographs are quite sensitive to maximum storm intensities. Thus, there is a need to continue the search for simple yet effective hourly rainfall disaggregation methods.
引用
收藏
页码:1213 / 1221
页数:9
相关论文
共 12 条
[1]  
Chapra SC., 2010, Numerical Methods for Engineers
[2]  
Chow T.V., 1988, APPL HYDROLOGY
[3]  
FREDERICK RH, 1977, NOAA TECHNICAL MEMO
[4]   DISAGGREGATION OF DAILY RAINFALL BY CONDITIONAL SIMULATION FROM A POINT-PROCESS MODEL [J].
GLASBEY, CA ;
COOPER, G ;
MCGECHAN, MB .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1995, 165 (1-4) :1-9
[5]   DISAGGREGATION OF DAILY RAINFALL [J].
HERSHENHORN, J ;
WOOLHISER, DA .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1987, 95 (3-4) :299-322
[6]  
HERSHFIELD DM, 1961, 40 US NAT WEATH SERV
[7]   Disaggregative invariance of daily precipitation [J].
Krzysztofowicz, R ;
Pomroy, TA .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 1997, 36 (06) :721-734
[8]  
Kuichling E., 1889, Transactions, American Society of Civil Engineers, V20, P1, DOI DOI 10.1061/TACEAT.0000694
[9]  
LIOU EY, 1970, 34 U KENT
[10]  
*MATHW INC, 1998, MATLAB VERS 5 0 US M