Irrigation technology choices under hydrologic uncertainty: A case study from Maipo River Basin, Chile

被引:32
作者
Cai, XM
Rosegrant, MW
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Ven Te Chow Hydrosyst Lab, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Washington, DC 20006 USA
[3] Int Water Management Inst, Colombo, Sri Lanka
关键词
irrigation; hydrologic uncertainty; stochastic optimization; risk analysis;
D O I
10.1029/2003WR002810
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[ 1] The effect of hydrologic uncertainty on field irrigation technology ( FIT) choices is studied within this paper. A two-stage stochastic programming model (SPM) is developed to incorporate hydrologic uncertainties related to both water requirements and water availability through a probabilistic scenario-based approach. The SPM can provide a mechanism with which model solutions can be adjusted to account for variations in water availability and water requirements. Moreover, the two-stage decision process is combined with risk aversion analysis in field irrigation choices, which helps balance the risk of profit loss in dry years and the risk of excess capital cost in wet years. The model can be used to generate decision information to individual farmers or farmer associations, regarding long-term field irrigation technology choices and crop pattern planning and short-term water allocation among crops under specific hydrologic scenarios. The model is applied to an irrigation district in the Maipo River Basin, Chile. It is found that higher levels of FIT are more profitable for higher-valued crops and decisions on FIT choices for low-valued crops are less sensitive to hydrologic uncertainties. The annualized capital cost per hectare in the district should be within in range of US$105-130, which is a range for tradeoff analysis between maximizing the expected profit and minimizing the risk of profit loss under drought conditions.
引用
收藏
页码:W041031 / W0410310
页数:10
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
Brooke A., 1998, GAMS USERS GUIDE
[2]   Irrigation performance measures: Efficiency and uniformity [J].
Burt, CM ;
Clemmens, AJ ;
Strelkoff, TS ;
Solomon, KH ;
Bliesner, RD ;
Hardy, LA ;
Howell, TA ;
Eisenhauer, DE .
JOURNAL OF IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE ENGINEERING, 1997, 123 (06) :423-442
[3]  
CAI X, 2001, P WORLD WAT ENV RES
[4]   Integrated hydrologic-agronomic-economic model for river basin management [J].
Cai, XM ;
McKinney, DC ;
Lasdon, LS .
JOURNAL OF WATER RESOURCES PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT, 2003, 129 (01) :4-17
[5]   A model of investment under uncertainty: Modern irrigation technology and emerging markets in water [J].
Carey, JM ;
Zilberman, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 84 (01) :171-183
[6]   ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL PERSPECTIVES ON NEW IRRIGATION TECHNOLOGY [J].
CARRUTHERS, I .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1990, 17 (1-3) :283-294
[7]  
CASWELL MF, 1985, AM J AGR ECON, V67, P223
[8]  
*CH2MHILL, 1989, IRR SYST COST PERF S
[9]  
CHRISTIANSEN EJ, 1942, B U CALIF, V670
[10]  
Dinar A., 1996, MODELING EC MANAGEME