Local spatial modeling of white-tailed deer distribution

被引:52
作者
Shi, H
Laurent, EJ
LeBouton, J
Racevskis, L
Hall, KR
Donovan, M
Doepker, RV
Walters, MB
Lupi, F
Liu, JG
机构
[1] Michigan State Univ, Ctr Syst Integrat & Sustainabil, Dept Fisheries & Wildlife, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ, Dept Forestry, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[3] Michigan State Univ, Dept Agr Econ, E Lansing, MI 48824 USA
[4] Michigan Dept Nat Resources, Lansing, MI 48909 USA
[5] Michigan Dept Nat Resources, Norway, MI 49884 USA
关键词
geographically weighted regression; ordinary linear-squares regression; white-tailed deer; spatial heterogeneity; climate; patch metrics; landscape metrics; geographic information systems;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.04.007
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
Complex spatial heterogeneity of ecological systems is difficult to capture and interpret using global models alone. For this reason, recent attention has been paid to local spatial modeling techniques. We used one local modeling approach, geographically weighted regression (GWR), to investigate the effects of local spatial heterogeneity on multivariate relationships of white-tailed deer distribution using land cover patch metrics and climate factors. The results of these analyses quantify differences in the contributions of model parameters to estimates of deer density over space. A GWR model with local kernel bandwidth was compared to a GWR model with global kernel bandwidth and an ordinary least-squares regression (OLS) model with the same parameters to evaluate their relative abilities in modeling deer distributions. The results indicated that the GWR models predicted deer density better than the traditional ordinary least-squares model and also provided useful information regarding local environmental processes affecting deer distribution. GWR model comparisons showed that the local kernel bandwidth GWR model was more realistic than the global kernel bandwidth GWR model, as the latter exaggerated local spatial variation. The parameter estimates and model statistics (e.g., model R-2) of the GWR models were mapped using geographic information systems (GIS) to illustrate local spatial variation in the regression relationship and to identify causes of large-scale model misspecifications and low estimation efficiencies. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:171 / 189
页数:19
相关论文
共 62 条
[1]   SPATIAL-ANALYSIS OF 2-SPECIES INTERACTIONS [J].
ANDERSEN, M .
OECOLOGIA, 1992, 91 (01) :134-140
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2003, PATCH ANAL EXTENSION
[3]  
ANSELIN L, 1988, PAP REG SCI ASSOC, V65, P11
[4]  
Anselin L., 1990, Spatial Statistics: Past, Present, and Future, P63
[5]  
ANSELIN L, 1988, SPATILA ECONOMETRICS
[6]   An autologistic model for the spatial distribution of wildlife [J].
Augustin, NH ;
Mugglestone, MA ;
Buckland, ST .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED ECOLOGY, 1996, 33 (02) :339-347
[7]  
BLOUCH EI, 1984, WHITE TAILED DEER EC, P391
[8]   ASsessing sexual segregation in deer [J].
Bowyer, RT ;
Stewart, KM ;
Wolfe, SA ;
Blundell, GM ;
Lehmkuhl, KL ;
Joy, PJ ;
McDonough, TJ ;
Kie, JG .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 2002, 66 (02) :536-544
[9]   THE LAGRANGE MULTIPLIER TEST AND ITS APPLICATIONS TO MODEL-SPECIFICATION IN ECONOMETRICS [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1980, 47 (01) :239-253
[10]   SIMPLE TEST FOR HETEROSCEDASTICITY AND RANDOM COEFFICIENT VARIATION [J].
BREUSCH, TS ;
PAGAN, AR .
ECONOMETRICA, 1979, 47 (05) :1287-1294