Vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis compared with the Cobb technique

被引:75
作者
Chen, YL [1 ]
机构
[1] Mingchi Inst Technol, Dept Ind Engn & Management, Taishan 243, Taipei Hsien, Taiwan
关键词
lumbar lordosis; radiographic measurements; reliability;
D O I
10.1097/00007632-199909010-00007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design. An observational study in which vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis, developed in this study, was used to examine lumbar curvature. The intra- and interobserver reliability of the vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis and the Cobb technique were compared. Objectives. To evaluate the reliability of a new method of measuring lumbar lordosis and to examine the changes in the lordotic curve from 0 degrees to 90 degrees flexion of the trunk. Summary of Background Data. Several different methods are used to measure lumbar lordosis. The Cobb technique, based on measurement of vertebral endplates, is the method most frequently adopted for clinical diagnosis. However, because of the variations in the vertebral endplate architecture, the vertebral surface angle is difficult to identify. This reduces the reliability of the Cobb technique. Methods. Lateral radiographs of 16 study participants were taken from the upright position to a trunk flexion of 90 degrees in 30 degrees increments. The lumbar lordotic curve was measured by three observers individually using two applications of the traditional Cobb technique and the vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis. Results. Correlation coefficients of lumbar lordosis between the two methods ranged from 0.589 to 0.772 with participants standing upright (all P < 0.05). Interobserver reliability coefficients were 0.903 for vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis, 0.826 for Cobb (L1-L5), and 0.784 for Cobb (L1-S1), although the three measurements all revealed an excellent intraobserver reproducibility (r greater than 0.9). The vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis showed the smallest mean absolute differences between any two observers' measurements (<1.7 degrees). Conclusions. The findings from this study indicate that the vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis is more reliable than the Cobb method for assessing lumbar lordosis. The vertebral centroid measurement of lumbar lordosis also can be used to evaluate the actual lumbar curvature in outline at various angles of trunk flexion.
引用
收藏
页码:1786 / 1790
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   VARIABILITY OF SCOLIOSIS MEASUREMENT FROM SPINAL ROENTGENOGRAMS [J].
BEEKMAN, CE ;
HALL, V .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1979, 59 (06) :764-765
[2]   MEASUREMENT OF SCOLIOSIS AND KYPHOSIS RADIOGRAPHS - INTRAOBSERVER AND INTEROBSERVER VARIATION [J].
CARMAN, DL ;
BROWNE, RH ;
BIRCH, JG .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (03) :328-333
[3]   A non-invasive protocol for the determination of lumbosacral vertebral angle [J].
Chen, YL ;
Lee, YH .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 1997, 12 (03) :185-189
[4]   Lumbar lordosis measurement: A new method versus Cobb technique [J].
Chernukha, KV ;
Daffner, RH ;
Reigel, DH .
SPINE, 1998, 23 (01) :74-79
[5]  
Cobb J, 1948, AM ACADEMY ORTHOPAED, P261
[6]   RADIOGRAPHIC MEASUREMENTS AND CLINICAL DECISIONS [J].
COWELL, HR .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1990, 72A (03) :319-319
[7]   ELECTROMYOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS OF 2 TECHNIQUES FOR SQUAT LIFTING [J].
DELITTO, RS ;
ROSE, SJ ;
APTS, DW .
PHYSICAL THERAPY, 1987, 67 (09) :1329-1334
[8]  
DVORAK J, 1991, SPINE, V16, P562
[9]  
FARFAN HF, 1975, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V6, P135
[10]   EVALUATION OF LUMBAR LORDOSIS - A PROSPECTIVE AND RETROSPECTIVE STUDY [J].
FERNAND, R ;
FOX, DE .
SPINE, 1985, 10 (09) :799-803