Interactive effects of physical and mental workload on subjective workload assessment

被引:102
作者
DiDomenico, Angela [1 ]
Nussbaum, Maury A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[2] Virginia Tech, Ind & Syst Engn, Blacksburg, VA USA
关键词
NASA-TLX; Borg CR10 Scale; Dual task; Attention;
D O I
10.1016/j.ergon.2008.01.012
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Individuals arc often expected to perform complex tasks involving physical and mental demands, particularly with the ongoing implementation of technology. Subjective workload assessment measures have been used extensively in a single domain (e.g., mental or physical), but at present there are no validated techniques available for measuring overall workload in multi-task situations. This study investigated the interaction between physical and mental demands and the effects of such interactions when using existing subjective workload assessment tools. Two common assessment tools (Borg CR10 Scale and NASA-TLX) were used to record changes in perceived Workload. Thirty participants (ages 18-24 years) performed tasks involving the concurrent completion of a lifting task and mental arithmetic at four levels of physical and mental demand, respectively. Ratings using the Borg CR10 Scale, a uni-dimensional scale for the physical domain, were not substantially affected by the presence of additional mental task demands. NASA-TLX scores, based oil a multi-dimensional assessment approach that included a physical demand component, reflected the mental workload demands, but were also affected by the addition of a concurrent physical task. Furthermore, there were no significant differences between the weighted and unweighted scores. Further research is needed to determine tile broader utility of these tools in providing all assessment of overall workload.
引用
收藏
页码:977 / 983
页数:7
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]   THE EFFECTS OF A MOBILE TELEPHONE TASK ON DRIVER BEHAVIOR IN A CAR FOLLOWING SITUATION [J].
ALM, H ;
NILSSON, L .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1995, 27 (05) :707-715
[2]   Subjective rating scales: science or art? [J].
Annett, J .
ERGONOMICS, 2002, 45 (14) :966-987
[4]   PSYCHOPHYSICAL BASES OF PERCEIVED EXERTION [J].
BORG, GAV .
MEDICINE AND SCIENCE IN SPORTS AND EXERCISE, 1982, 14 (05) :377-381
[5]   SPEAKING FROM THE HEART - CARDIOVASCULAR COMPONENTS OF STRESS RATING CHANGES AND THE RELATIVE REACTIVITY OF PHYSIOLOGICAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL VARIABLES [J].
BRODY, S ;
MAIER, C ;
MONTOYA, P ;
RAU, H .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF APPLIED PHYSIOLOGY AND OCCUPATIONAL PHYSIOLOGY, 1994, 69 (04) :277-280
[6]   Context effects in subjective mental workload ratings [J].
Colle, HA ;
Reid, GB .
HUMAN FACTORS, 1998, 40 (04) :591-600
[7]  
Eggemeier F T., 1991, Multiple Task Performance, P207, DOI DOI 10.1201/9781003069447-12
[8]   An investigation of myocardial aerobic capacity as a measure of both physical and cognitive workloads [J].
Fredericks, TK ;
Choi, SD ;
Hart, J ;
Butt, SE ;
Mital, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ERGONOMICS, 2005, 35 (12) :1097-1107
[9]   What is 'heavy'? [J].
Genaidy, AM ;
Karwowski, W ;
Christensen, DM ;
Vogiatzis, C ;
Deraiseh, N ;
Prins, A .
ERGONOMICS, 1998, 41 (04) :420-432
[10]  
HART S G, 1988, P139