The effect of a quantitative resuscitation strategy on mortality in patients with sepsis: A meta-analysis

被引:148
作者
Jones, Alan E. [1 ]
Brown, Michael D. [2 ]
Trzeciak, Stephen [4 ,5 ]
Shapiro, Nathan I. [3 ]
Garrett, John S. [1 ]
Heffner, Alan G. [1 ]
Kline, Jeffrey A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Carolinas Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Charlotte, NC 28203 USA
[2] Michigan State Univ Program Emergency Med, Grand Rapids MERC, Grand Rapids, MI USA
[3] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Dept Emergency Med, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[4] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Emergency Med, Camden, NJ USA
[5] Cooper Univ Hosp, Dept Med, Div Crit Care Med, UMDNJ Robert Wood Johnson Med Sch Camden, Camden, NJ USA
关键词
sepsis; septic shock; mortality; resuscitation; meta-analysis;
D O I
10.1097/CCM.0b013e318186f839
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Objective: Quantitative resuscitation consists of structured cardiovascular intervention targeting predefined hemodynamic end points. We sought to measure the treatment effect of quantitative resuscitation on mortality from sepsis. Data Sources: We conducted a systematic review of the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, conference proceedings, clinical practice guidelines, and other sources using a comprehensive strategy. Study Selection: We identified randomized control trials comparing quantitative resuscitation with standard resuscitation in adult patients who were diagnosed with sepsis using standard criteria. The primary outcome variable was mortality. Data Abstraction: Three authors independently extracted data and assessed study quality using standardized instruments; consensus was reached by conference. Preplanned subgroup analysis required studies to be categorized based on early (at the time of diagnosis) vs. late resuscitation implementation. We used the chi-square test and l(2) to assess for statistical heterogeneity (p < 0.10, l(2) > 25%). The primary analysis was based on the random effects model to produce pooled odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: The search yielded 29 potential publications; nine studies were included in the final analysis, providing a sample of 1001 patients. The combined results demonstrate a decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.64, 95% confidence interval 0.43-0.96); however, there was statistically significant heterogeneity (p = 0.07, l(2) = 45%). Among the early quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 6) there was minimal heterogeneity (p = 0.40, l(2) = 2.4%) and a significant decrease in mortality (odds ratio 0.50, 95% confidence interval 0.37-0.69). The late quantitative resuscitation studies (n = 3) demonstrated no significant effect on mortality (odds ratio 1.16, 95% confidence interval 0.60-2.22). Conclusion: This meta-analysis found that applying an early quantitative resuscitation strategy to patients with sepsis imparts a significant reduction in mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:2734 / 2739
页数:6
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
Abroug F, 2002, NEW ENGL J MED, V346, P1025
[2]   A randomized and controlled trial of the effect of treatment aimed at maximizing oxygen delivery in patients with severe sepsis or septic shock [J].
Alía, I ;
Esteban, A ;
Gordo, F ;
Lorente, JA ;
Diaz, C ;
Rodriguez, JA ;
Frutos, F .
CHEST, 1999, 115 (02) :453-461
[3]   Epidemiology of severe sepsis in the United States: Analysis of incidence, outcome, and associated costs of care [J].
Angus, DC ;
Linde-Zwirble, WT ;
Lidicker, J ;
Clermont, G ;
Carcillo, J ;
Pinsky, MR .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2001, 29 (07) :1303-1310
[4]   Effect of treatment with low doses of hydrocortisone and fludrocortisone on mortality in patients with septic shock [J].
Annane, D ;
Sébille, V ;
Charpentier, C ;
Bollaert, PE ;
François, B ;
Korach, JM ;
Capellier, G ;
Cohen, Y ;
Azoulay, E ;
Troché, G ;
Chaumet-Riffaut, P ;
Bellissant, E .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 288 (07) :862-871
[5]   Norepinephrine plus dobutamine versus epinephrine alone for management of septic shock:: a randomised trial [J].
Annane, Djillali ;
Vignon, Philippe ;
Renault, Alain ;
Bollaert, Pierre-Edouard ;
Charpentier, Claire ;
Martin, Claude ;
Troche, Gilles ;
Ricard, Jean-Damien ;
Nitenberg, Gerard ;
Papazian, Laurent ;
Azoulay, Elie ;
Bellissant, Eric .
LANCET, 2007, 370 (9588) :676-684
[6]   Efficacy and safety of recombinant human activated protein C for severe sepsis. [J].
Bernard, GR ;
Vincent, JL ;
Laterre, P ;
LaRosa, SP ;
Dhainaut, JF ;
Lopez-Rodriguez, A ;
Steingrub, JS ;
Garber, GE ;
Helterbrand, JD ;
Ely, EW ;
Fisher, CJ .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (10) :699-709
[7]   DEFINITIONS FOR SEPSIS AND ORGAN FAILURE AND GUIDELINES FOR THE USE OF INNOVATIVE THERAPIES IN SEPSIS [J].
BONE, RC ;
BALK, RA ;
CERRA, FB ;
DELLINGER, RP ;
FEIN, AM ;
KNAUS, WA ;
SCHEIN, RMH ;
SIBBALD, WJ .
CHEST, 1992, 101 (06) :1644-1655
[8]   Barriers to implementing protocol-based sepsis resuscitation in the emergency department - Results of a national survey [J].
Carlbom, David J. ;
Rubenfeld, Gordon D. .
CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE, 2007, 35 (11) :2525-2532
[9]  
*CDCP, 1991, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V39, P31
[10]   Doing new research? Don't forget the old - Nobody should do a trial without reviewing what is known [J].
Clarke, M .
PLOS MEDICINE, 2004, 1 (02) :100-102