Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory

被引:480
作者
Ruecker, Gerta [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Freiburg, Inst Med Biometry & Med Informat, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
关键词
network meta-analysis; electrical network; graph theory; Laplacian matrix; Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse; MULTIPLE-TREATMENTS METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1002/jrsm.1058
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Network meta-analysis is an active field of research in clinical biostatistics. It aims to combine information from all randomized comparisons among a set of treatments for a given medical condition. We show how graph-theoretical methods can be applied to network meta-analysis. A meta-analytic graph consists of vertices (treatments) and edges (randomized comparisons). We illustrate the correspondence between meta-analytic networks and electrical networks, where variance corresponds to resistance, treatment effects to voltage, and weighted treatment effects to current flows. Based thereon, we then show that graph-theoretical methods that have been routinely applied to electrical networks also work well in network meta-analysis. In more detail, the resulting consistent treatment effects induced in the edges can be estimated via the Moore-Penrose pseudoinverse of the Laplacian matrix. Moreover, the variances of the treatment effects are estimated in analogy to electrical effective resistances. It is shown that this method, being computationally simple, leads to the usual fixed effect model estimate when applied to pairwise meta-analysis and is consistent with published results when applied to network meta-analysis examples from the literature. Moreover, problems of heterogeneity and inconsistency, random effects modeling and including multi-armed trials are addressed. Copyright (C) 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:312 / 324
页数:13
相关论文
共 24 条
  • [1] Albert A, 1972, REGRESSION MOORE PEN, P15
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1971, Generalized Inverses of Matrices and its Applications
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2007, R News
  • [5] Bailey R.A., 2009, Surv. Combin., V365, P19, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781107325975.003
  • [6] Bollobas B, 2002, Modern Graph Theory
  • [7] Checking consistency in mixed treatment comparison meta-analysis
    Dias, S.
    Welton, N. J.
    Caldwell, D. M.
    Ades, A. E.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2010, 29 (7-8) : 932 - 944
  • [8] Doyle PG, 1999, CARUS MATH MONOGRAPH
  • [9] Random-walk computation of similarities between nodes of a graph with application to collaborative recommendation
    Fouss, Francois
    Pirotte, Alain
    Renders, Jean-Michel
    Saerens, Marco
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, 2007, 19 (03) : 355 - 369
  • [10] Gantmacher FR., 1986, Matrizentheorie, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-71243-2