A systematic review of paracetamol for non-specific low back pain

被引:49
作者
Davies, Reece A. [2 ]
Maher, Christopher G. [1 ,3 ]
Hancock, Mark J. [2 ]
机构
[1] George Inst Int Hlth, Musculoskeletal Div, Sydney, NSW 2050, Australia
[2] Univ Sydney, Back Pain Res Grp, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[3] Univ Sydney, Fac Med, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
基金
英国医学研究理事会;
关键词
Low back pain; Paracetamol; Acetaminophen; Review;
D O I
10.1007/s00586-008-0783-x
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy of paracetamol (acetaminophen) in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. We conducted a systematic review of randomized controlled trials to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in the treatment of pain and disability in patients with non-specific low back pain. A search for randomized controlled trials was conducted using the Medline, Embase and CINAHL databases. Trials were eligible if they were randomized controlled trials comparing paracetamol to no treatment, placebo or another treatment in patients with non-specific low back pain. Two of the authors independently assessed trials for methodological quality on the PEDro Scale and extracted data. Continuous pain and disability data were converted to a common 0-10 scale; ordinal data were dichotomized (e.g., no pain, pain). The data was analyzed using the MIX version 1.61 meta-analysis software. Out of 205 unique articles found in the searches, 7 eligible trials were identified. The trials enrolled a total of 676 participants with 5 investigating acute low back pain, 1 investigating chronic low back pain and 1 investigating both. No trial provided data comparing paracetamol to placebo and only one trial compared paracetamol to no treatment. In general the trials were small (only 1 trial had > 25 subjects per group) and of low methodological quality (only 2 had a score above 6 on the quality scale). All but one of the trials provided imprecise estimates of the effects of treatment with confidence intervals spanning clinically important beneficial and also harmful effects of paracetamol. No trial reported a statistically significant difference in favor of paracetamol. There is insufficient evidence to assess the efficacy of paracetamol in patients with low back pain. There is a clear need for large, high quality randomized controlled trials evaluating paracetamol, to provide reliable evidence of paracetamol's effectiveness in patients with low back pain and to establish the validity of the recommendations in clinical guidelines.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1430
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
[Anonymous], EV BAS MAN AC MUSC P
[2]
Development and validation of MIX: Comprehensive free software for meta-analysis of causal research data [J].
Bax L. ;
Yu L.-M. ;
Ikeda N. ;
Tsuruta H. ;
Moons K.G.M. .
BMC Medical Research Methodology, 6 (1)
[3]
The PEDro scale provides a more comprehensive measure of methodological quality than the Jadad Scale in stroke rehabilitation literature [J].
Bhogal, SK ;
Teasell, RW ;
Foley, NC ;
Speechley, MR .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2005, 58 (07) :668-673
[4]
DELCAMBRE B, 2000, DIAGNOSIS MANAGEMENT
[5]
Egger M, 2003, Health Technol Assess, V7, P1
[6]
GOW P, 2004, NZ ACUTE LOW BACK PA
[7]
Graham Garry G, 2005, Am J Ther, V12, P46, DOI 10.1097/00045391-200501000-00008
[8]
HACKETT GI, 1988, PRACTITIONER, V232, P163
[9]
HICKEY RFJ, 1982, NEW ZEAL MED J, V95, P312
[10]
Higgins J., 2008, COCHRANE COLLABORATI