Prediction of the strength of the elderly proximal femur by bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound measurements of the heel and tibia

被引:110
作者
Bouxsein, ML
Coan, BS
Lee, SC
机构
[1] Beth Israel Deaconess Med Ctr, Orthoped Biomech Lab, Boston, MA 02215 USA
[2] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
关键词
quantitative ultrasound; femoral strength; bone mineral density; hip fracture; tibia; heel; tibia SOS;
D O I
10.1016/S8756-3282(99)00093-9
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Quantitative ultrasound (QUS) of the heel and tibia have recently been approved in the United States for diagnostic evaluation of low bone mass, The goal of this study was to use human cadaveric specimens to compare correlations among: a) strength of the proximal femur; b) bone mineral density of the femur, tibia, and heel; and c) QUS of the tibia and heel. We obtained 26 proximal femurs and intact lower limbs from 16 female and 10 male cadavers, with a mean age of 81 +/- 12 years, Bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm(2)) of the proximal femur and tibia were assessed using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry, and BRID (g/cm) of the heel was measured using single-energy x-ray absorptiometry, Ultrasound velocity at the mid-tibia was determined using a contact, gel-coupled ultrasound device. Broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) and speed of sound (SOS) of the heel were determined using a transmission ultrasound device with water-based coupling. The femurs were tested to failure in a configuration designed to simulate a fall to the side with impact to the greater trochanter, iis in previous studies, the strength of the proximal femur was very strongly correlated with femoral BMD and heel BMD (r(2) = 0.78-0.92, p < 0.0001 for all). BUA and SOS of the heel were also strongly correlated to femoral strength (r(2) = 0.70 and 0.67, respectively p < 0.0001 for both), whereas tibia SOS was only weakly correlated (r(2) = 0.19, p = 0.03), The average coefficient of variation for triplicate tibial SOS measurements was 0.50%. This study indicates that, although tibial SOS measurements are precise, they are not strongly correlated with femoral Bm) or strength. In contrast, heel QUS measurements are strongly correlated with the strength of the proximal femur. These findings imply that tibial SOS may be of limited use for assessing hip fracture risk, Prospective fracture risk data are needed to define further the clinical utility of tibia ultrasound measurements, (C) 1999 by Elsevier Science Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:49 / 54
页数:6
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]   Professional certification and site accreditation in bone densitometry [J].
Avecilla, LS .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1998, 1 (01) :81-89
[2]   A sound strategy for bones [J].
Baran, DT .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1998, 1 (03) :209-210
[3]   Broadband ultrasound attenuation predicts fractures strongly and independently of densitometry in older women - A prospective study [J].
Bauer, DC ;
Gluer, CC ;
Cauley, JA ;
Vogt, TM ;
Ensrud, KE ;
Genant, HK ;
Black, DM .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1997, 157 (06) :629-634
[4]   Peripheral or axial bone density measurements? [J].
Blake, GM ;
Patel, R ;
Fogelman, I .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL DENSITOMETRY, 1998, 1 (01) :55-63
[5]   ULTRASOUND AND DENSITOMETRY OF THE CALCANEUS CORRELATE WITH THE FAILURE LOADS OF CADAVERIC FEMURS [J].
BOUXSEIN, ML ;
COURTNEY, AC ;
HAYES, WC .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1995, 56 (02) :99-103
[6]  
BOUXSEIN ML, 1995, J BONE MINER RES, V10, pS178
[7]  
CARTER DR, 1992, J BONE MINER RES, V7, P137
[8]   Assessment of the strength of proximal femur in vitro: Relationship to femoral bone mineral density and femoral geometry [J].
Cheng, XG ;
Lowet, G ;
Boonen, S ;
Nicholson, PHF ;
Brys, P ;
Nijs, J ;
Dequeker, J .
BONE, 1997, 20 (03) :213-218
[9]   ULTRASONIC VELOCITY AND ATTENUATION IN MAMMALIAN-TISSUES [J].
CHIVERS, RC ;
PARRY, RJ .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1978, 63 (03) :940-953
[10]   EFFECTS OF LOADING RATE ON STRENGTH OF THE PROXIMAL FEMUR [J].
COURTNEY, AC ;
WACHTEL, EF ;
MYERS, ER ;
HAYES, WC .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 1994, 55 (01) :53-58