Conceptualizing and operationalizing human wellbeing for ecosystem assessment and management

被引:165
作者
Breslow, Sara Jo [1 ,16 ]
Sojka, Brit [2 ]
Barnea, Raz [2 ]
Basurto, Xavier [3 ]
Carothers, Courtney [4 ]
Charnley, Susan [5 ,6 ]
Coulthard, Sarah
Dolsak, Nives [2 ]
Donatuto, Jamie [7 ]
Garcia-Quijano, Carlos [8 ]
Hicks, Christina C. [9 ,10 ]
Levine, Arielle [11 ,17 ]
Mascia, Michael B. [12 ]
Norman, Karma [1 ]
Poe, Melissa [1 ,13 ]
Satterfield, Terre [14 ]
St Martin, Kevin [15 ]
Levin, Phillip S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NOAA, Northwest Fisheries Sci Ctr, 2725 Montlake Blvd E, Seattle, WA 98112 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Marine & Environm Affairs, 3707 Brooklyn Ave NE, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
[3] Duke Univ, Nicholas Sch Environm, 135 Duke Marine Lab Rd, Beaufort, NC 28516 USA
[4] Univ Alaska Fairbanks, Sch Fisheries & Ocean Sci, Anchorage, AK 99501 USA
[5] US Forest Serv, USDA, Pacific Northwest Res Stn, 620 SW Main St,Suite 400, Portland, OR 97205 USA
[6] Northumbria Univ, Dept Social Sci & Languages, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 8ST, Tyne & Wear, England
[7] Swinomish Indian Tribal Commun, 11404 Moorage Way, La Conner, WA 98257 USA
[8] Univ Rhode Isl, Dept Sociol & Anthropol, Kingston, RI 02881 USA
[9] Stanford Univ, Ctr Ocean Solut, Monterey, CA 93940 USA
[10] James Cook Univ, ARC Ctr Excellence Coral Reef Studies, Townsville, Qld 4811, Australia
[11] San Diego State Univ, Dept Geog, 5500 Campanile Dr, San Diego, CA 92182 USA
[12] Conservat Int, Moore Ctr Sci, 2011 Crystal Dr,Suite 500, Arlington, VA 22202 USA
[13] Univ Washington, Washington Sea Grant, 3716 Brooklyn Ave NE, Washington, WA 98105 USA
[14] Univ British Columbia, Inst Resources Environm & Sustainabil, 429-2202 Main Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada
[15] Rutgers State Univ, Dept Geog, Piscataway, NJ 08854 USA
[16] Univ Washington, Ctr Creat Conservat, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[17] NOAA, Coral Reef Conservat Program, SSMC4,1305 East West Hwy, Silver Spring, MD 20910 USA
关键词
Human wellbeing; Indicators; Ecosystem-based management; Integrated ecosystem assessment; Social-ecological system; Sustainability; ENVIRONMENTAL-MANAGEMENT; FISHING COMMUNITIES; SOCIAL-SCIENCE; HEALTH; CONSERVATION; INDICATORS; SERVICES; IMPACTS; COASTAL; US;
D O I
10.1016/j.envsci.2016.06.023
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
There is growing interest in assessing the effects of changing environmental conditions and management actions on human wellbeing. A challenge is to translate social science expertise regarding these relationships into terms usable by environmental scientists, policymakers, and managers. Here, we present a comprehensive, structured, and transparent conceptual framework of human wellbeing designed to guide the development of indicators and a complementary social science research agenda for ecosystem-based management. Our framework grew out of an effort to develop social indicators for an integrated ecosystem assessment (IEA) of the California Current large marine ecosystem. Drawing from scholarship in international development, anthropology, geography, and political science, we define human wellbeing as a state of being with others and the environment, which arises when human needs are met, when individuals and communities can at meaningfully to pursue their goals, and when individuals and communities enjoy a satisfactory quality of life. We propose four major social science-based constituents of wellbeing: connections, capabilities, conditions, and cross-cutting domains. The latter includes the domains of equity and. justice, security, resilience, and sustainability, which may be assessed through cross-cutting analyses of other constituents. We outline a process for identifying policy-relevant attributes of wellbeing that can guide ecosystem assessments. To operationalize the framework, we provide a detailed table of attributes and a large database of available indicators, which may be used to develop measures suited to a variety of management needs and social goals. Finally, we discuss four guidelines for operationalizing human wellbeing measures in ecosystem assessments, including considerations for context, feasibility, indicators and research, and social difference. Developed for the U.S. west coast, the framework may be adapted for other regions, management needs, and scales with appropriate modifications. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:250 / 259
页数:10
相关论文
共 77 条
[1]   Vulnerability [J].
Adger, W. Neil .
GLOBAL ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE-HUMAN AND POLICY DIMENSIONS, 2006, 16 (03) :268-281
[2]   Social-ecological resilience to coastal disasters [J].
Adger, WN ;
Hughes, TP ;
Folke, C ;
Carpenter, SR ;
Rockström, J .
SCIENCE, 2005, 309 (5737) :1036-1039
[3]  
Alkire S., 2008, CAPABILITY APPROACH
[4]  
[Anonymous], MILL DEV GOALS IND
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and Human Well being synthesis
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2013, MEAS AUSTR PROGR
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2015, OB AD 2013 NEAR YEAR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Indicators and Information Systems for Sustainable Development, A Report to the Balaton Group
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2010, NEW PRESS
[10]  
[Anonymous], 2015, LON OLD PEOPL