Smallpox as a biological weapon - Medical and public health management

被引:581
作者
Henderson, DA
Inglesby, TV
Bartlett, JG
Ascher, MS
Eitzen, E
Jahrling, PB
Hauer, J
Layton, M
McDade, J
Osterholm, MT
O'Toole, T
Parker, G
Perl, T
Russell, PK
Tonat, K
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ, Ctr Civilian Biodef Studies, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[2] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[3] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Med, Baltimore, MD 21202 USA
[4] Calif Dept Hlth, Berkeley, CA USA
[5] USA, Med Res Inst Infect Dis, Frederick, MD USA
[6] New York City Dept Hlth, Off Emergency Management, New York, NY 10013 USA
[7] New York City Dept Hlth, Off Communicable Dis, New York, NY 10013 USA
[8] Ctr Dis Control & Prevent, Atlanta, GA USA
[9] Minnesota Dept Hlth, Minneapolis, MN USA
[10] US Dept HHS, Off Emergency Preparedness, Rockville, MD USA
来源
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION | 1999年 / 281卷 / 22期
关键词
D O I
10.1001/jama.281.22.2127
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objective. To develop consensus-based recommendations for measures to be taken by medical and public health professionals following the use of smallpox as a biological weapon against a civilian population. Participants. The working group included 21 representatives from staff of major medical centers and research, government, military, public health, and emergency management institutions and agencies. Evidence. The first author (D.A.H..) conducted a literature search in conjunction with the preparation of another publication on smallpox as well as this article. The literature identified was reviewed and opinions were sought from experts in the diagnosis and management of smallpox, including members of the working group. Consensus Process. The first draft of the consensus statement was a synthesis of information obtained in the evidence-gathering process. Members of the working group provided formal written comments that were incorporated into the second draft of the statement. The working group reviewed the second draft on October 30, 1998. No significant disagreements existed and comments were incorporated into a third draft. The fourth and final statement incorporates all relevant evidence obtained by the literature search in conjunction with final consensus recommendations supported by all working group members. Conclusions. Specific recommendations are made regarding smallpox vaccination, therapy, postexposure isolation and infection control, hospital epidemiology and infection control, home care, decontamination of the environment, and additional research needs. In the event of an actual release of smallpox and subsequent epidemic, early detection, isolation of infected individuals, surveillance of contacts, and a focused selective vaccination program will be the essential items of an effective control program.
引用
收藏
页码:2127 / 2137
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
Alibek K., 1999, BIOHAZARD
[2]  
ANDERS W, 1962, BUNDESGESUNDHEITSBLA, V17, P265
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, MMWR Recomm Rep, V40, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1983, PRINCES PEASANTS
[5]   Poxvirus dilemmas - Monkeypox, smallpox, and biologic terrorism [J].
Breman, JG ;
Henderson, DA .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1998, 339 (08) :556-559
[6]  
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1990, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V40, P445
[7]   Variation in type of infectious disease as shown by the history of smallpox in the United States 1895-1912 [J].
Chapin, CV .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1913, 13 (02) :171-196
[8]  
CHAPIN CV, 1932, J PREV MED, V1, P1
[10]  
DIXON CW, 1962, SMALLPOX, P1460