Aerosol direct radiative effects over the northwest Atlantic, northwest Pacific, and North Indian Oceans: estimates based on in-situ chemical and optical measurements and chemical transport modeling

被引:118
作者
Bates, T. S.
Anderson, T. L.
Baynard, T.
Bond, T.
Boucher, O.
Carmichael, G.
Clarke, A.
Erlick, C.
Guo, H.
Horowitz, L.
Howell, S.
Kulkarni, S.
Maring, H.
McComiskey, A.
Middlebrook, A.
Noone, K.
O'Dowd, C. D.
Ogren, J.
Penner, J.
Quinn, P. K.
Ravishankara, A. R.
Savoie, D. L.
Schwartz, S. E.
Shinozuka, Y.
Tang, Y.
Weber, R. J.
Wu, Y.
机构
[1] NOAA, Pacific Marine Environm Lab, Seattle, WA 98115 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Atmospher Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
[3] NOAA, Earth Syst Res Lab, Boulder, CO USA
[4] Univ Illinois, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[5] Met Off, Climate Chem & Ecosyst Team, Exeter, Devon, England
[6] Univ Iowa, Ctr Global & Reg Environm Res, Iowa City, IA USA
[7] Univ Hawaii, Dept Oceanog, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[8] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Dept Atmospher Sci, Jerusalem, Israel
[9] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[10] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ USA
[11] NASA Headquarters, Radiat Sci Program, Washington, DC USA
[12] NOAA, Climate Monitoring & Diagnost Lab, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[13] Int Geosphere Biosphere Program, Stockholm, Sweden
[14] Natl Univ Ireland, Dept Expt Phys, Galway, Ireland
[15] Natl Univ Ireland, Environm Change Inst, Galway, Ireland
[16] Univ Miami, Rosenstiel Sch Marine & Atmospher Sci, Miami, FL 33149 USA
[17] Brookhaven Natl Lab, Dept Environm Sci, Upton, NY 11973 USA
[18] Georgia Inst Technol, Sch Earth & Atmospher Sci, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
D O I
10.5194/acp-6-1657-2006
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The largest uncertainty in the radiative forcing of climate change over the industrial era is that due to aerosols, a substantial fraction of which is the uncertainty associated with scattering and absorption of shortwave ( solar) radiation by anthropogenic aerosols in cloud-free conditions (IPCC, 2001). Quantifying and reducing the uncertainty in aerosol influences on climate is critical to understanding climate change over the industrial period and to improving predictions of future climate change for assumed emission scenarios. Measurements of aerosol properties during major field campaigns in several regions of the globe during the past decade are contributing to an enhanced understanding of atmospheric aerosols and their effects on light scattering and climate. The present study, which focuses on three regions downwind of major urban/population centers ( North Indian Ocean (NIO) during INDOEX, the Northwest Pacific Ocean (NWP) during ACE-Asia, and the Northwest Atlantic Ocean (NWA) during ICARTT), incorporates understanding gained from field observations of aerosol distributions and properties into calculations of perturbations in radiative fluxes due to these aerosols. This study evaluates the current state of observations and of two chemical transport models ( STEM and MOZART). Measurements of burdens, extinction optical depth (AOD), and direct radiative effect of aerosols (DRE - change in radiative flux due to total aerosols) are used as measurement-model check points to assess uncertainties. In-situ measured and remotely sensed aerosol properties for each region ( mixing state, mass scattering efficiency, single scattering albedo, and angular scattering properties and their dependences on relative humidity) are used as input parameters to two radiative transfer models (GFDL and University of Michigan) to constrain estimates of aerosol radiative effects, with uncertainties in each step propagated through the analysis. Constraining the radiative transfer calculations by observational inputs increases the clear-sky, 24-h averaged AOD ( 34 +/- 8%), top of atmosphere (TOA) DRE ( 32 +/- 12%), and TOA direct climate forcing of aerosols (DCF - change in radiative flux due to anthropogenic aerosols) ( 37 +/- 7%) relative to values obtained with "a priori" parameterizations of aerosol loadings and properties (GFDL RTM). The resulting constrained clear-sky TOA DCF is - 3.3 +/- 0.47, - 14 +/- 2.6, - 6.4 +/- 2.1W m(-2) for the NIO, NWP, and NWA, respectively. With the use of constrained quantities ( extensive and intensive parameters) the calculated uncertainty in DCF was 25% less than the "structural uncertainties" used in the IPCC-2001 global estimates of direct aerosol climate forcing. Such comparisons with observations and resultant reductions in uncertainties are essential for improving and developing confidence in climate model calculations incorporating aerosol forcing.
引用
收藏
页码:1657 / 1732
页数:76
相关论文
共 255 条
  • [1] Submicron aerosol composition at Trinidad Head, California, during ITCT 2K2: Its relationship with gas phase volatile organic carbon and assessment of instrument performance
    Allan, JD
    Bower, KN
    Coe, H
    Boudries, H
    Jayne, JT
    Canagaratna, MR
    Millet, DB
    Goldstein, AH
    Quinn, PK
    Weber, RJ
    Worsnop, DR
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D23) : 1 - 16
  • [2] The new GFDL global atmosphere and land model AM2-LM2: Evaluation with prescribed SST simulations
    Anderson, JL
    Balaji, V
    Broccoli, AJ
    Cooke, WF
    Delworth, TL
    Dixon, KW
    Donner, LJ
    Dunne, KA
    Freidenreich, SM
    Garner, ST
    Gudgel, RG
    Gordon, CT
    Held, IM
    Hemler, RS
    Horowitz, LW
    Klein, SA
    Knutson, TR
    Kushner, PJ
    Langenhost, AR
    Lau, NC
    Liang, Z
    Malyshev, SL
    Milly, PCD
    Nath, MJ
    Ploshay, JJ
    Ramaswamy, V
    Schwarzkopf, MD
    Shevliakova, E
    Sirutis, JJ
    Soden, BJ
    Stern, WF
    Thompson, LA
    Wilson, RJ
    Wittenberg, AT
    Wyman, BL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLIMATE, 2004, 17 (24) : 4641 - 4673
  • [3] An "A-Train" strategy for quantifying direct climate forcing by anthropogenic aerosols
    Anderson, TL
    Charlson, RJ
    Bellouin, N
    Boucher, O
    Chin, M
    Christopher, SA
    Haywood, J
    Kaufman, YJ
    Kinne, S
    Ogren, JA
    Remer, LA
    Takemura, T
    Tanré, D
    Torres, O
    Trepte, CR
    Wielicki, BA
    Winker, DM
    Yu, HB
    [J]. BULLETIN OF THE AMERICAN METEOROLOGICAL SOCIETY, 2005, 86 (12) : 1795 - +
  • [4] Variability of aerosol optical properties derived from in situ aircraft measurements during ACE-Asia
    Anderson, TL
    Masonis, SJ
    Covert, DS
    Ahlquist, NC
    Howell, SG
    Clarke, AD
    McNaughton, CS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2003, 108 (D23)
  • [5] INTERNAL MIXTURE OF SEA SALT, SILICATES, AND EXCESS SULFATE IN MARINE AEROSOLS
    ANDREAE, MO
    CHARLSON, RJ
    BRUYNSEELS, F
    STORMS, H
    VANGRIEKEN, R
    MAENHAUT, W
    [J]. SCIENCE, 1986, 232 (4758) : 1620 - 1623
  • [6] Emission of trace gases and aerosols from biomass burning
    Andreae, MO
    Merlet, P
    [J]. GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2001, 15 (04) : 955 - 966
  • [7] `Comparison of methods for deriving aerosol asymmetry parameter
    Andrews, E
    Sheridan, PJ
    Fiebig, M
    McComiskey, A
    Ogren, JA
    Arnott, P
    Covert, D
    Elleman, R
    Gasparini, R
    Collins, D
    Jonsson, H
    Schmid, B
    Wang, J
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2006, 111 (D5)
  • [8] Coastal boundary layer influence on pollutant transport in New England
    Angevine, WM
    Senff, CJ
    White, AB
    Williams, EJ
    Koermer, J
    Miller, STK
    Talbot, R
    Johnston, PE
    McKeen, SA
    Downs, T
    [J]. JOURNAL OF APPLIED METEOROLOGY, 2004, 43 (10): : 1425 - 1437
  • [9] [Anonymous], 2001, CLIM CHANG 2001
  • [10] Chemical composition of atmospheric aerosols from Zhenbeitai, China, and Gosan, South Korea, during ACE-Asia
    Arimoto, R
    Zhang, XY
    Huebert, BJ
    Kang, CH
    Savoie, DL
    Prospero, JM
    Sage, SK
    Schloesslin, CA
    Khaing, HM
    Oh, SN
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2004, 109 (D19) : D19S041 - 15