Sensitivity and kinetics of mouse rod flash responses determined in vivo from paired-flash electroretinograms

被引:62
作者
Hetling, JR
Pepperberg, DR
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Ophthalmol & Visual Sci, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Univ Illinois, Dept Bioengn, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON | 1999年 / 516卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1469-7793.1999.0593v.x
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
1. Electroretinograms (ERGs) were recorded corneally from. C57BL/8J mice using a paired-flash procedure in which a brief test flash at time zero was followed at time t(probe) by a bright probe flash of fixed strength, and in which the probe response amplitude was determined at time t = t(probe) + 6 ms. Probe responses obtained in a series of paired-flash trials were analysed to derive A(t), a family of amplitudes that putatively represents the massed response of the rod photoreceptors to the test flash. A central aim was to obtain a mathematical description of the normalized derived response A (t)/A(mo) as a function of I-test, the test flash strength. 2. With fixed tprobe (80 less than or equal to t(probe) less than or equal to 1200 ms), A(t)/A(mo) was described by the saturating exponential function [1 - exp(-k(t)I(test))], where k(t) is a time-dependent sensitivity parameter. For t = 86 ms, a time near the peak of A(t), k(86) was 7.0 +/- 1.2 (scotopic ed s m(-2))(-1) (mean +/- S.D.; n = 4). 3. A(t)/A(mo) data were analysed in relation to the equation below, a time-generalized form of the above exponential function in which (k(86)I(test)) is replaced by the product [k(86)I(test)u(t)], and where u(t) is independent of the test flash strength. The function u(t) was modelled as the product of a scaling factor gamma, an activation term {1 - exp[-alpha(t - t(d))(2)]}, and a decay term exp(- t/tau(omega)): A(t)A(mo) = 1 - exp[-k(86)I(test)u(t)]; u(t) = gamma{1 - exp[-alpha(t - t(d))(2)]}exp(-t/tau(omega)), where t(d) is a brief delay, tau(omega) is an exponential time constant, and a characterizes the acceleration of the activation term. For I-test up to similar to 2.57 scotopic ed s m(-2), the overall time course of A(t) was well described by the above equation with gamma = 2.21, t(d) = 3.1 ms, tau(omega) = 132 ms and alpha = 2.32 x 10(-4) ms(-2). An approximate halving of alpha improved the fit of the above equation to ERG a-wave and A(t)/A(mo) data obtained at t about 0-20 ms. 4. Kinetic and sensitivity properties of A(t) suggest that it approximates the in vivo massed photocurrent response of the rods to a test flash, and imply that u(t) in the above equation is the approximate kinetic description of a unit, i.e. single photon, response.
引用
收藏
页码:593 / 609
页数:17
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]   THE PHOTOCURRENT, NOISE AND SPECTRAL SENSITIVITY OF RODS OF THE MONKEY MACACA-FASCICULARIS [J].
BAYLOR, DA ;
NUNN, BJ ;
SCHNAPF, JL .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1984, 357 (DEC) :575-607
[2]  
BIRCH DG, 1995, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V36, P1603
[3]  
BRETON ME, 1994, INVEST OPHTH VIS SCI, V35, P295
[4]   LOCALIZATION OF ORIGINS OF ELECTRORETINOGRAM COMPONENTS BY INTRARETINAL RECORDING IN INTACT CAT EYE [J].
BROWN, KT ;
WIESEL, TN .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1961, 158 (02) :257-&
[5]  
CARTERDAWSON LD, 1979, J COMP NEUROL, V188, P245, DOI 10.1002/cne.901880204
[6]   MECHANISMS OF RHODOPSIN INACTIVATION IN-VIVO AS REVEALED BY A COOH-TERMINAL TRUNCATION MUTANT [J].
CHEN, J ;
MAKINO, CL ;
PEACHEY, NS ;
BAYLOR, DA ;
SIMON, MI .
SCIENCE, 1995, 267 (5196) :374-377
[7]   An alternative phototransduction model for human rod and cone ERG a-waves: Normal parameters and variation with age [J].
Cideciyan, AV ;
Jacobson, SG .
VISION RESEARCH, 1996, 36 (16) :2609-2621
[8]   HUMAN PHOTORECEPTOR TOPOGRAPHY [J].
CURCIO, CA ;
SLOAN, KR ;
KALINA, RE ;
HENDRICKSON, AE .
JOURNAL OF COMPARATIVE NEUROLOGY, 1990, 292 (04) :497-523
[9]   Rod phototransduction in transgenic mice expressing a mutant opsin gene [J].
Goto, Y ;
Peachey, NS ;
Ziroli, NE ;
Seiple, WH ;
Gryczan, C ;
Pepperberg, DR ;
Naash, MI .
JOURNAL OF THE OPTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA A-OPTICS IMAGE SCIENCE AND VISION, 1996, 13 (03) :577-585