Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis - The Multicenter TOPAS (truly or pseudo-severe aortic stenosis) study

被引:201
作者
Blais, C
Burwash, IG
Mundigler, G
Dumesnil, JG
Loho, N
Rader, F
Baumgartner, H
Beanlands, RS
Chayer, B
Kadem, L
Garcia, D
Durand, LG
Pibarot, P
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Quebec Heart Inst, Res Ctr, Laval Hosp, Ste Foy, PQ G1V 4G5, Canada
[2] Univ Ottawa, Inst Heart, Ottawa, ON, Canada
[3] Med Univ Vienna, Vienna Gen Hosp, Vienna, Austria
[4] Inst Rech Clin Montreal, Montreal, PQ H2W 1R7, Canada
关键词
aortic valve stenosis; echocardiography; hemodynamics; surgery; valves;
D O I
10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.557678
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Background - We sought to investigate the use of a new parameter, the projected effective orifice area (EOA(proj)) at normal transvalvular flow rate (250 mL/s), to better differentiate between truly severe (TS) and pseudo-severe (PS) aortic stenosis (AS) during dobutamine stress echocardiography (DSE). Changes in various parameters of stenosis severity have been used to differentiate between TS and PS AS during DSE. However, the magnitude of these changes lacks standardization because they are dependent on the variable magnitude of the transvalvular flow change occurring during DSE. Methods and Results - The use of EOAproj to differentiate TS from PS AS was investigated in an in vitro model and in 23 patients with low-flow AS (indexed EOA < 0.6 cm(2)/m(2), left ventricular ejection fraction <= 40%) undergoing DSE and subsequent aortic valve replacement. For an individual valve, EOA was plotted against transvalvular flow (Q) at each dobutamine stage, and valve compliance (VC) was derived as the slope of the regression line fitted to the EOA versus Q plot; EOA(proj) was calculated as EOA(proj) = EOA(rest) + VC x( 250 - Q(rest)), where EOA(rest) and Q(rest) are the EOA and Q at rest. Classification between TS and PS was based on either response to flow increase (in vitro) or visual inspection at surgery (in vivo). EOAproj was the most accurate parameter in differentiating between TS and PS both in vitro and in vivo. In vivo, 15 of 23 patients (65%) had TS and 8 of 23 (35%) had PS. The percentage of correct classification was 83% for EOA(proj) and 91% for indexed EOA(proj) compared with percentages of 61% to 74% for the other echocardiographic parameters usually used for this purpose. Conclusions - EOAproj provides a standardized evaluation of AS severity with DSE and improves the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TS and PS AS in patients with low-flow, low-gradient AS.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 721
页数:11
相关论文
共 22 条
  • [1] Estimation of the end of ejection in aortic stenosis - An unreported source of error in the invasive assessment of severity
    Bermejo, J
    Rojo-Alvarez, JL
    Antoranz, JC
    Abel, M
    Burwash, IG
    Yotti, R
    Moreno, M
    Garcia-Fernandez, MA
    Lehmann, KG
    Otto, CM
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2004, 110 (09) : 1114 - 1120
  • [2] Clinical efficacy of Doppler-echocardiographic indices of aortic valve stenosis:: A comparative test-based analysis of outcome
    Bermejo, J
    Odreman, R
    Feijoo, J
    Moreno, MM
    Gómez-Moreno, P
    García-Fernández, MA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (01) : 142 - 151
  • [3] Impact of valve prosthesis-patient mismatch on short-term mortality after aortic valve replacement
    Blais, C
    Dumesnil, JG
    Baillot, R
    Simard, S
    Doyle, D
    Pibarot, P
    [J]. CIRCULATION, 2003, 108 (08) : 983 - 988
  • [4] Comparison of valve resistance with effective orifice area regarding flow dependence
    Blais, C
    Pibarot, P
    Dumesnil, JG
    Garcia, D
    Chen, DM
    Durand, LG
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2001, 88 (01) : 45 - 52
  • [5] ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease - A report of the American College of Cardiology American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines (Committee on Management of Patients with Valvular Heart Disease)
    Bonow, RO
    Carabello, B
    De Leon, AC
    Edmunds, LH
    Fedderly, BJ
    Freed, MD
    Gaasch, WH
    Mckay, CR
    Nishimura, RA
    O'Gara, PT
    O'Rourke, RA
    Rahimtoola, SH
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1998, 32 (05) : 1486 - 1582
  • [6] Hemodynamic stability of valve area, valve resistance, and stroke work loss in aortic stenosis: A comparative analysis
    Burwash, IG
    Hay, KM
    Chan, KL
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY OF ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY, 2002, 15 (08) : 814 - 822
  • [7] ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC VOLUME FLOW AND STENOSIS SEVERITY MEASURES WITH CHANGING FLOW-RATE IN AORTIC-STENOSIS
    BURWASH, IG
    FORBES, AD
    SADAHIRO, M
    VERRIER, ED
    PEARLMAN, AS
    THOMAS, R
    KRAFT, C
    OTTO, CM
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY, 1993, 265 (05): : H1734 - H1743
  • [8] AORTIC-VALVE RESISTANCE AS AN ADJUNCT TO THE GORLIN FORMULA IN ASSESSING THE SEVERITY OF AORTIC-STENOSIS IN SYMPTOMATIC PATIENTS
    CANNON, JD
    ZILE, MR
    CRAWFORD, FA
    CARABELLO, BA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 1992, 20 (07) : 1517 - 1523
  • [9] Determinants of symptoms and exercise capacity in aortic stenosis: a comparison of resting haemodynamics and valve compliance during dobutamine stress
    Das, P
    Rimington, H
    Smeeton, N
    Chambers, J
    [J]. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL, 2003, 24 (13) : 1254 - 1263
  • [10] USEFULNESS OF DOBUTAMINE ECHOCARDIOGRAPHY IN DISTINGUISHING SEVERE FROM NONSEVERE VALVULAR AORTIC-STENOSIS IN PATIENTS WITH DEPRESSED LEFT-VENTRICULAR FUNCTION AND LOW TRANSVALVULAR GRADIENTS
    DEFILIPPI, CR
    WILLETT, DL
    BRICKNER, E
    APPLETON, CP
    YANCY, CW
    EICHHORN, EJ
    GRAYBURN, PA
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 1995, 75 (02) : 191 - 194