Reversing NIMBY: an assessment of state strategies for siting hazardous-waste facilities

被引:30
作者
Ibitayo, OO [1 ]
Pijawka, KD
机构
[1] Jackson State Univ, Dept Publ Policy & Adm, Sch Liberal Arts, Jackson, MS 39211 USA
[2] Arizona State Univ, Sch Planning & Landscape Architecture, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
[3] Arizona State Univ, Ctr Environm Studies, Tempe, AZ 85287 USA
来源
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING C-GOVERNMENT AND POLICY | 1999年 / 17卷 / 04期
关键词
D O I
10.1068/c170379
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Past research indicates a dismal success rate in the siting of hazardous-waste management facilities. The observation that some facilities have been sited, however, suggests that the siting of these locally unwanted environmental facilities may not be an intractable problem. In this paper, based on a national survey of state siting attempts over the past decade, the strategies adopted by states and the factors and combination of factors associated with the few successful outcomes are examined. The data indicate that public trust (especially in the facility developer), early and continuous public involvement in the facility siting process, and an adaptive strategy that involves incorporating citizens' concerns into siting and operation decisions are associated with a higher likelihood of siting success.
引用
收藏
页码:379 / 389
页数:11
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
BOWMAN A, 1985, STATE LOCAL GOVERNME, P155
[3]  
DANTICO M, 1991, ANN C AM ASS ADV SCI
[4]  
DAVIS CE, 1993, POLITICS HAZARDOUS W
[5]  
DAVIS CE, 1989, ENV POLITICS POLICY, P57
[6]  
*EPA, 1979, SIT HAZ WAST MAN FAC
[7]  
Fischhoff Baruch., 1981, Acceptable Risk
[8]   TRUST AS A DETERMINANT OF OPPOSITION TO A HIGH-LEVEL RADIOACTIVE-WASTE REPOSITORY - ANALYSIS OF A STRUCTURAL MODEL [J].
FLYNN, J ;
BURNS, W ;
MERTZ, CK ;
SLOVIC, P .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1992, 12 (03) :417-429
[9]  
Fowler F., 1988, Survey research methods
[10]   INCENTIVES POLICIES TO SITE HAZARDOUS-WASTE FACILITIES [J].
GREGORY, R ;
KUNREUTHER, H ;
EASTERLING, D ;
RICHARDS, K .
RISK ANALYSIS, 1991, 11 (04) :667-675