Implant design and interface force transfer - A photoelastic and strain-gauge analysis

被引:116
作者
Cehreli, M
Duyck, J
De Cooman, M
Puers, R
Naert, I
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, BIOMAT Res Grp, Dept Prosthet Dent, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Hacettepe Univ, Fac Dent, Dept Prosthodont, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Catholic Univ Louvain, Dept Electrotech EAST MICAS, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
biomechanics; implant design; oral implants; photoelastic stress analysis; strain-gauge analysis;
D O I
10.1111/j.1600-0501.2004.00979.x
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare stress and strain magnitudes of butt-joint and internal-cone oral implants in a bone simulant. Material and methods: Photoelastic and strain-gauged models of solitary Branemark((R)), ITI(R) and Astra Tech((R)) implants were obtained. Vertical and 20degrees oblique forces of 100 and 150 N were applied on the abutments in separate load cases. Isochromatic fringe patterns around implants were observed and photographed in the field of a polariscope. Strain-gauge measurements were performed and principal strains induced around implants were calculated. Results: Isochromatic fringe orders of all designs were similar under both loading conditions (P>0.05). Strains around Branemark((R)) implants were lower than around Astra Tech((R)) and ITI(R) implants, particularly under vertical loads. The latter implants had similar strain magnitudes (P>0.05), although strains around the conical Astra Tech((R)) implant were lower under vertical load. Conclusions: Butt-joint and internal-cone oral implants have similar force distribution characteristics. The implant-abutment mating design is not a decisive factor affecting stress and strain magnitudes in a bone simulant.
引用
收藏
页码:249 / 257
页数:9
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   The peri-implant hard and soft tissues at different implant systems - A comparative study in the dog [J].
Abrahamsson, I ;
Berglundh, T ;
Wennstrom, J ;
Lindhe, J .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1996, 7 (03) :212-219
[2]   Evaluation of the mechanical characteristics of the implant-abutment complex of a reduced-diameter morse-taper implant -: A nonlinear finite element stress analysis [J].
Akça, K ;
Çehreli, MC ;
Iplikçioglu, H .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 2003, 14 (04) :444-454
[3]   STATE-OF-THE-ART IN ORAL IMPLANTS [J].
ALBREKTSSON, T ;
SENNERBY, L .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY, 1991, 18 (06) :474-481
[4]  
[Anonymous], BIOMECHANICS CLIN DE
[5]   Five-year prospective follow-up report of the Astra Tech Dental Implant System in the treatment of edentulous mandibles [J].
Arvidson, K ;
Bystedt, H ;
Frykholm, A ;
von Konow, L ;
Lothigius, E .
CLINICAL ORAL IMPLANTS RESEARCH, 1998, 9 (04) :225-234
[6]   THE LAW OF BONE TRANSFORMATION - A CASE OF CRYING WOLFF [J].
BERTRAM, JEA ;
SWARTZ, SM .
BIOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 1991, 66 (03) :245-273
[7]  
BOBYN JD, 1992, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P79
[8]  
Brunski J B, 1988, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V3, P85
[9]  
Clelland N L, 1993, Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants, V8, P541
[10]  
Cochran DL, 1998, J BIOMED MATER RES, V40, P1, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4636(199804)40:1<1::AID-JBM1>3.0.CO