Treatment intensity and childhood apraxia of speech

被引:69
作者
Namasivayam, Aravind K. [1 ]
Pukonen, Margit [2 ]
Goshulak, Debra [2 ]
Hard, Jennifer [3 ]
Rudzicz, Frank [6 ]
Rietveld, Toni [5 ]
Maassen, Ben [4 ]
Kroll, Robert [2 ]
van Lieshout, Pascal [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dept Speech Language Pathol, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Speech & Stuttering Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] ErinoakKids Ctr Treatment & Dev, Mississauga, ON, Canada
[4] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
[5] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[6] Toronto Rehabil Inst, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
childhood apraxia of speech; treatment intensity; developmental motor speech disorders; speech intelligibility; speech-sound disorder; functional outcomes; CHILDREN; INTELLIGIBILITY; COMMUNICATION; INTERVENTION; FREQUENCY; OUTCOMES; FOCUS;
D O I
10.1111/1460-6984.12154
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100103 [病原生物学]; 100213 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
摘要
BackgroundIntensive treatment has been repeatedly recommended for the treatment of speech deficits in childhood apraxia of speech (CAS). However, differences in treatment outcomes as a function of treatment intensity have not been systematically studied in this population. AimTo investigate the effects of treatment intensity on outcome measures related to articulation, functional communication and speech intelligibility for children with CAS undergoing individual motor speech intervention. Methods & ProceduresA total of 37 children (32-54 months of age) with CAS received 1x/week (lower intensity) or 2x/week (higher intensity) individual motor speech treatment for 10 weeks. Assessments were carried out before and after a 10-week treatment block to study the effects of variations in treatment intensity on the outcome measures. Outcomes & ResultsThe results indicated that only higher intensity treatment (2x/week) led to significantly better outcomes for articulation and functional communication compared with 1x/week (lower intensity) intervention. Further, neither lower nor higher intensity treatment yielded a significant change for speech intelligibility at the word or sentence level. In general, effect sizes for the higher intensity treatment groups were larger for most variables compared with the lower intensity treatment group. Conclusions & ImplicationsOverall, the results of the current study may allow for modification of service delivery and facilitate the development of an evidence-based care pathway for children with CAS.
引用
收藏
页码:529 / 546
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]
Intervention Efficacy and Intensity for Children With Speech Sound Disorder [J].
Allen, Melissa M. .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH LANGUAGE AND HEARING RESEARCH, 2013, 56 (03) :865-877
[2]
[Anonymous], COCHRANE DATABASE SY
[3]
[Anonymous], 2007, CHILDH APR SPEECH PO
[4]
Boersma P., 2012, PRAAT DOING PHONETIC
[5]
Caruso A.J., 1999, Clinical management of motor speech disorders in children
[6]
Connected speech intelligibility of children with cochlear implants and children with normal hearing [J].
Chin, SB ;
Tsai, PL ;
Gao, SJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2003, 12 (04) :440-451
[7]
Cohen J., 1988, Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, VSecond
[8]
Intervention for children with severe speech disorder: A comparison of two approaches [J].
Crosbie, S ;
Holm, A ;
Dodd, B .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS, 2005, 40 (04) :467-491
[9]
Dollaghan C.A., 2007, HDB EVIDENCE BASED P
[10]
The Importance of Production Frequency in Therapy for Childhood Apraxia of Speech [J].
Edeal, Denice Michelle ;
Gildersleeve-Neumann, Christina Elke .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY, 2011, 20 (02) :95-110