Factors affecting primary fascial closure of the open abdomen in the nontrauma patient

被引:41
作者
Goussous, Naeem [1 ]
Kim, Brian D. [1 ]
Jenkins, Donald H. [1 ]
Zielinski, Martin D. [1 ]
机构
[1] Mayo Clin, Div Trauma Crit Care & Gen Surg, Dept Gen Surg, Rochester, MN 55902 USA
关键词
ABDOMINAL CLOSURE; DAMAGE-CONTROL; MANAGEMENT; FAILURE;
D O I
10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.015
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
100210 [外科学];
摘要
Introduction. Septic wound complications are known to limit the ability of surgeons. to perform primary fascial closure after damage control laparotomy (DCL) in patients with trauma. Factors preventing primary fascial closure after DCL in nontrauma patients, however, are unknown. We aim to identify these risk factors. Methods. Institutional research board approval was obtained to review the medical records of nontrauma patients undergoing DCL between December 2006 and June 2010. Patients who died before an attempt at fascial closure were excluded. Univariate analysis was performed comparing patients with primary fascial closure to partial fascial or planned ventral hernia. Data are presented as median or percentage as appropriate. Statistical significance was considered at P < .05. Results. One hundred eighty-one patients were identified (53% male), of whom 8 died before an attempt at fascial closure, leaving 173 patients within the study cohort. Primary fascial closure was achieved in 111 patients (64%), with the remaining patients receiving either partial fascial or planned ventral hernia closure. The cumulative rate of primary fascial closure plateaued by day 12 at 62%. Patients. who achieved prima?) fascial closure had a greater incidence of pre-existent corona?) artery disease (32% vs 16%) and arrhythmia (27% vs 11 %). There was a superior base deficit on admission ( 7 vs 9,) in the primary closure cohort. There was equivalent mortality (21% vs 25%) and intensive care unit stay (9 days vs 14 days); however, the overall hospital stay (22 vs 42 days) and ventilator days (4 vs 6) in the primary fascial closure group were shortened. Success of primary fascial closure was associated with lower incidence of septic complications (39% vs 59%), enterocutaneous fistulae (4% vs 11%), and intra-abdominal abscess (14% vs 33%), as well as fewer days of open abdomen management (2 vs 6), and number of serial abdominal explorations (2 vs 4) and a lower fluid balance over the first 10 days. Conclusion. The development of septic complications such as intro-abdominal abscess and enterocutaneous fistulae were associated with inability to primarily close the fascia after DEL. In addition, longer duration of open abdomen management, greater number of serial abdominal explorations, and worse base deficits were negatively associated with primary fascial closure. (Surgery 2012;152:777-84.)
引用
收藏
页码:777 / 784
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
Multicentre prospective study of fascial closure rate after open abdomen with vacuum and mesh-mediated fascial traction [J].
Acosta, S. ;
Bjarnason, T. ;
Petersson, U. ;
Palsson, B. ;
Wanhainen, A. ;
Svensson, M. ;
Djavani, K. ;
Bjorck, M. .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2011, 98 (05) :735-743
[2]
TEMPORARY ABDOMINAL CLOSURE (TAC) FOR PLANNED RELAPAROTOMY (ETAPPENLAVAGE) IN TRAUMA [J].
APRAHAMIAN, C ;
WITTMANN, DH ;
BERGSTEIN, JM ;
QUEBBEMAN, EJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 30 (06) :719-723
[3]
Acute renal failure - definition, outcome measures, animal models, fluid therapy and information technology needs: the Second International Consensus Conference of the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) Group [J].
Bellomo, R ;
Ronco, C ;
Kellum, JA ;
Mehta, RL ;
Palevsky, P .
CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 8 (04) :R204-R212
[4]
Longterm Impact of Abdominal Decompression: A Prospective Comparative Analysis [J].
Cheatham, Michael L. ;
Safcsak, Karen .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2008, 207 (04) :573-579
[5]
Abdominal compartment syndrome [J].
Cheatham, Michael Lee .
CURRENT OPINION IN CRITICAL CARE, 2009, 15 (02) :154-162
[6]
Long-term physical, mental, and functional consequences of abdominal decompression [J].
Cheatham, ML ;
Safcsak, K ;
Llerena, LE ;
Morrow, CE ;
Block, EFJ .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2004, 56 (02) :237-241
[7]
The Management of the Open Abdomen in Trauma and Emergency General Surgery: Part 1-Damage Control [J].
Diaz, Jose J., Jr. ;
Cullinane, Daniel C. ;
Dutton, William D. ;
Jerome, Rebecca ;
Bagdonas, Richard ;
Bilaniuk, Jarolslaw O. ;
Collier, Bryan R. ;
Como, John J. ;
Cumming, John ;
Griffen, Maggie ;
Gunter, Oliver L. ;
Kirby, John ;
Lottenburg, Larry ;
Mowery, Nathan ;
Riordan, William P., Jr. ;
Martin, Niels ;
Platz, Jon ;
Stassen, Nicole ;
Winston, Eleanor S. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2010, 68 (06) :1425-1437
[8]
GARCIASABRIDO JL, 1988, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V123, P152
[9]
Complications after 344 damage-control open celiotomies [J].
Miller, RS ;
Morris, JA ;
Diaz, JJ ;
Herring, MB ;
May, AK .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2005, 59 (06) :1365-1371
[10]
Temporary Abdominal Closure: Long-Term Outcomes [J].
Patel, Nirav Y. ;
Cogbill, Thomas H. ;
Kallies, Kara J. ;
Mathiason, Michelle A. .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 2011, 70 (04) :769-773