Prevalence of low back pain in three occupational groups in Shanghai, People's Republic of China

被引:96
作者
Jin, K
Sorock, GS
Courtney, TK
机构
[1] Liberty Mutual Res Inst Safety, Hopkinton, MA 01748 USA
[2] Fudan Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Shanghai, Peoples R China
[3] Harvard Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[4] Johns Hopkins Univ, Sch Publ Hlth, Baltimore, MD USA
关键词
back pain; occupational; China; epidemiology;
D O I
10.1016/j.jsr.2003.11.002
中图分类号
TB18 [人体工程学];
学科分类号
1201 ;
摘要
Problem: Low back pain (LBP) is one of the most prevalent work-related conditions affecting employed populations in developed countries, yet little is known about this condition among the world's largest, single-nation labor force: The People's Republic of China. Method: This is a cross-sectional study of the prevalence of low back pain (LBP) among garment workers, battery/kiln workers, and teachers in Shanghai, People's Republic of China. Data were collected by personal interview and physical examination at six work sites. The overall response rate was 78%. Results: The overall (N = 3 83) self-reported annual prevalence of LBP symptoms lasting 24 hours or more was 50%. Garment workers had a higher annual prevalence of LBP (74%) than teachers (40%), prevalence ratio (PR = 1.9, 95% CI = 1.4-2.4). Discussion: The overall annual prevalence of self-reported LBP (50%) was higher than that reported among 50 other Chinese employed study populations (30%). Healthy worker effects may have limited the conclusions from this cross-sectional study. Summary: These results suggest that LBP is a prevalent condition in Chinese workers and that more work should be done to estimate its impact on the Chinese workforce. The findings for garment workers were consistent with increased risk of LBP among persons doing work in fixed, sedentary postures. (C) 2004 National Safety Council and Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:23 / 28
页数:6
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]  
Bigos S., 1994, CLIN PRACTICE GUIDEL, P95
[2]   A GUIDE TO INTERPRETING EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES ON THE ETIOLOGY OF BACK PAIN [J].
BOMBARDIER, C ;
KERR, MS ;
SHANNON, HS ;
FRANK, JW .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (18) :S2047-S2056
[3]   COMPARISON OF METHODS FOR THE ASSESSMENT OF POSTURAL LOAD ON THE BACK [J].
BURDORF, A ;
LAAN, J .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1991, 17 (06) :425-429
[4]   Positive and negative evidence of risk factors for back disorders [J].
Burdorf, A ;
Sorock, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF WORK ENVIRONMENT & HEALTH, 1997, 23 (04) :243-256
[5]  
GARDNER MJ, 2000, STAT CONFIDENCE, P57
[6]   BACK PAIN AMONG WORKERS IN THE UNITED-STATES - NATIONAL ESTIMATES AND WORKERS AT HIGH-RISK [J].
GUO, HR ;
TANAKA, S ;
CAMERON, LL ;
SELIGMAN, PJ ;
BEHRENS, VJ ;
GER, J ;
WILD, DK ;
PUTZANDERSON, V .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL MEDICINE, 1995, 28 (05) :591-602
[7]  
Jin K, 2000, Int J Occup Environ Health, V6, P26
[8]  
KLEINBAUM DG, 1982, EPIDEMIOLOGIC RES PR, P147
[9]   STANDARDIZED NORDIC QUESTIONNAIRES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF MUSCULOSKELETAL SYMPTOMS [J].
KUORINKA, I ;
JONSSON, B ;
KILBOM, A ;
VINTERBERG, H ;
BIERINGSORENSEN, F ;
ANDERSSON, G ;
JORGENSEN, K .
APPLIED ERGONOMICS, 1987, 18 (03) :233-237
[10]   THE PREVALENCE OF LOW-BACK-PAIN IN THE LITERATURE - A STRUCTURED REVIEW OF 26 NORDIC STUDIES FROM 1954 TO 1993 [J].
LEBOEUFYDE, C ;
LAURITSEN, JM .
SPINE, 1995, 20 (19) :2112-2118