A Simplified, Noninvasive Stool DNA Test for Colorectal Cancer Detection

被引:116
作者
Itzkowitz, Steven [1 ]
Brand, Randall [2 ]
Jandorf, Lina
Durkee, Kris [10 ]
Millholland, John [10 ]
Rabeneck, Linda [3 ]
Schroy, Paul C., III [4 ]
Sontag, Stephen [5 ]
Johnson, David [6 ]
Markowitz, Sanford [7 ,8 ]
Paszat, Lawrence [9 ]
Berger, Barry M. [10 ]
机构
[1] Mt Sinai Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol, Dept Med & Oncol Sci, New York, NY 10029 USA
[2] Evanston NW Healthcare, GI Div, Evanston, IL USA
[3] Univ Toronto, Sunnybrook Reg Canc Ctr, Toronto, ON, Canada
[4] Boston Univ, Sch Med, GI Div, Boston, MA 02118 USA
[5] Hines Vet Affairs Hosp, GI Sect, Hines, IL USA
[6] Eastern VA Med Sch, Div Gastroenterol, Norfolk, VA 23501 USA
[7] Case Western Reserve Univ, Howard Hughes Med Inst, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[8] Case Western Reserve Univ, Dept Med, Cleveland, OH 44106 USA
[9] Sunnybrook Hlth Sci Ctr, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada
[10] Exact Sci Corp, Marlborough, MA USA
关键词
D O I
10.1111/j.1572-0241.2008.02088.x
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
BACKGROUND: As a noninvasive colorectal cancer (CRC) screening test, a multi-marker first generation stool DNA (sDNA V 1.0) test is superior to guaiac-based fecal occult blood tests. An improved sDNA assay (version 2), utilizing only two markers, hypermethylated vimentin gene (hV) and a two site DNA integrity assay (DY), demonstrated in a training set (phase 1a) an even higher sensitivity (88%) for CRC with a specificity of 82%. AIM: To validate in an independent set of patients (phase 1b) the sensitivity and specificity of sDNA version 2 for CRC. METHODS: Forty-two patients with CRC and 241 subjects with normal colonoscopy (NC) provided stool samples, to which they immediately added DNA stabilizing buffer, and mailed their specimen to the laboratory. DNA was purified using gel-based capture, and analyzed for hV and DY using methods identical to those previously published. RESULTS: Using the same cutpoints as the 1a training set (N = 162; 40 CRCs, 122 normals), hV demonstrated a higher and DY a slightly lower sensitivity, for a combined sensitivity of hV + DY of 86%. Optimal cutpoints based on the combined phase 1a + 1b dataset (N = 445; 82 CRCs, 363 normals) yielded a CRC sensitivity of 83%. The vast majority of cancers were detected regardless of tumor stage, tumor location, or patient age. Assay specificity in the phase 1b dataset for hV, DY, and hV + DY was 82%, 85%, and 73%, respectively, using the phase 1a cutpoints. Optimal cutpoints based on the combined phase 1a + 1b dataset yield a specificity of 82%. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides validation of a simplified, improved sDNA test that incorporates only two markers and that demonstrates high sensitivity (83%) and specificity (82%) for CRC. Test performance is highly reproducible in a large set of patients. The use of only two markers will make the test easier to perform, reduce the cost, and facilitate distribution to local laboratories.
引用
收藏
页码:2862 / 2870
页数:9
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Colorectal cancer screening in older men and women: Qualitative research findings and implications for intervention [J].
Beeker, C ;
Kraft, JM ;
Southwell, BG ;
Jorgensen, CM .
JOURNAL OF COMMUNITY HEALTH, 2000, 25 (03) :263-278
[2]   Colorectal cancer screening using stool DNA analysis in clinical practice: Early clinical experience with respect to patient acceptance and colonoscopic follow-up of abnormal tests [J].
Berger, Barry M. ;
Schroy, Paul C., III ;
Rosenberg, Jennifer L. ;
Lai-Goldman, Myla ;
Eisenberg, Marcia ;
Brown, Trisha ;
Rochelle, Robert B. ;
Billings, Paul R. .
CLINICAL COLORECTAL CANCER, 2006, 5 (05) :338-343
[3]  
*CDC, 2006, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V55, P308
[4]   Detection in fecal DNA of colon cancer-specific methylation of the nonexpressed vimentin gene [J].
Chen, WD ;
Han, ZJ ;
Skoletsky, J ;
Olson, J ;
Sah, J ;
Myeroff, L ;
Platzer, P ;
Lu, SL ;
Dawson, D ;
Willis, J ;
Pretlow, TR ;
Lutterbaugh, J ;
Kasturi, L ;
Willson, JKV ;
Rao, JS ;
Shuber, A ;
Markowitz, SD .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (15) :1124-1132
[5]   A program to enhance completion of screening colonoscopy among urban minorities [J].
Chew, Lea Ann ;
Santos, Stephanie ;
Jandorf, Lina ;
Christie, Jennifer ;
Castillo, Anabella ;
Winke, Gary ;
Itzkowitz, Steven .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 6 (04) :443-450
[6]  
FELDMAN GE, 2003, CITY HLTH INFORM, V22, P1
[7]   Impact of colonic cleansing on quality and diagnostic yield of colonoscopy: the European Panel of Appropriateness of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy European multicenter study [J].
Froehlich, F ;
Wietlisbach, V ;
Gonvers, JJ ;
Burnand, B ;
Vader, JP .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (03) :378-384
[8]   Impact of colonoscopy preparation quality on detection of suspected colonic neoplasia [J].
Harewood, GC ;
Sharma, VK ;
de Garmo, P .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (01) :76-79
[9]   Methylation-specific PCR: A novel PCR assay for methylation status of CpG islands [J].
Herman, JG ;
Graff, JR ;
Myohanen, S ;
Nelkin, BD ;
Baylin, SB .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, 1996, 93 (18) :9821-9826
[10]   Fecal DNA versus fecal occult blood for colorectal-cancer screening in an average-risk population [J].
Imperiale, TF ;
Ransohoff, DF ;
Itzkowitz, SH ;
Turnbull, BA ;
Ross, ME .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (26) :2704-2714