Salvage temozolomide for prior temozolomide responders

被引:68
作者
Franceschi, E
Omuro, AMP
Lassman, AB
Demopoulos, A
Nolan, C
Abrey, LE
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Neurol, New York, NY 10021 USA
[2] Bellaria Hosp, Dept Med Oncol, Bologna, Italy
关键词
brain tumor; chemotherapy; glioma; glioblastoma; temozolomide;
D O I
10.1002/cncr.21564
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND. Temozolomide (TMZ) often is used as adjuvant or first-line therapy for patients with glioma. Because of potential hematologic complications, it usually is discontinued after 12-18 cycles, even in responders. Subsequent salvage therapies are reported to have limited efficacy at the time of disease recurrence. In the current study, the authors assessed the outcome and complications of reusing TMZ at the time of disease recurrence in patients who previously responded to treatment. METHODS. A retrospective review of patients with recurrent/progressive glioma who had a history of response to TMZ and were treated with the same agent at the time of disease recurrence was conducted. RESULTS. Fourteen patients were identified (8 men and 6 women). The median age of the patients was 56 years (range, 25-67 yrs) at the time of diagnosis; 9 patients had glioblastoma, 3 had anaplastic astrocytoma, and 2 patients had low-grade oligodendroglioma. No patient developed disease progression while receiving the initial TMZ treatment. At the time of the initial disease recurrence, 13 patients were readministered TMZ. One patient received TMZ at the time of second disease recurrence. All patients were assessed for radiographic response. Objective respouse or stable disease was achieved in 6 patients (43%; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 21-67%) and the 6-month progression-free survival was 36% (95% CI, 16-61%). CONCLUSIONS. TMZ was found to be well tolerated and effective in this setting, suggesting that repeat use of TMZ in previous responders warrants further investigation.
引用
收藏
页码:2473 / 2476
页数:4
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]  
Bodell WJ, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P545
[2]   Phase II study of primary temozolomide chemotherapy in patients with WHO grade II gliomas [J].
Brada, M ;
Viviers, L ;
Abson, C ;
Hines, F ;
Britton, J ;
Ashley, S ;
Sardell, S ;
Traish, D ;
Gonsalves, A ;
Wilkins, P ;
Westbury, C .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2003, 14 (12) :1715-1721
[3]   Temozolomide as a second-line systemic regimen in recurrent high-grade glioma:: A phase II study [J].
Brandes, AA ;
Ermani, M ;
Basso, U ;
Amistà, P ;
Berti, F ;
Scienza, R ;
Rotilio, A ;
Pinna, G ;
Gardiman, M ;
Monfardini, S .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2001, 12 (02) :255-257
[4]   Safety and efficacy of temozolomide in patients with recurrent anaplastic oligodendrogliomas after standard radiotherapy and chemotherapy [J].
Chinot, OL ;
Honore, S ;
Dufour, H ;
Barrie, M ;
Figarella-Branger, D ;
Muracciole, X ;
Braguer, D ;
Martin, PM ;
Grisoli, F .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 19 (09) :2449-2455
[5]   Workshop: options for therapy in ovarian cancer [J].
Herzog, TJ ;
Holloway, RW ;
Stuart, GCE .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2003, 90 (03) :S45-S50
[6]   RESPONSE CRITERIA FOR PHASE-II STUDIES OF SUPRATENTORIAL MALIGNANT GLIOMA [J].
MACDONALD, DR ;
CASCINO, TL ;
SCHOLD, SC ;
CAIRNCROSS, JG .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1990, 8 (07) :1277-1280
[7]   Initial chemotherapy in gliomatosis cerebri [J].
Sanson, M ;
Cartalat-Carel, S ;
Taillibert, S ;
Napolitano, M ;
Djafari, L ;
Cougnard, J ;
Gervais, H ;
Laigle, F ;
Carpentier, A ;
Mokhtari, K ;
Taillandier, L ;
Chinot, O ;
Duffau, H ;
Honnorat, J ;
Hoang-Xuan, K ;
Delattre, JY .
NEUROLOGY, 2004, 63 (02) :270-275
[8]  
STUPP R, 2005, NEW ENGL J MED, P52987
[9]  
VANDENBENT MJ, 2003, J CLIN ONCOL, P12525
[10]   A phase II study of temozolomide vs. procarbazine in patients with glioblastoma multiforme at first relapse [J].
Yung, WKA ;
Albright, RE ;
Olson, J ;
Fredericks, R ;
Fink, K ;
Prados, MD ;
Brada, M ;
Spence, A ;
Hohl, RJ ;
Shapiro, W ;
Glantz, M ;
Greenberg, H ;
Selker, RG ;
Vick, NA ;
Rampling, R ;
Friedman, H ;
Phillips, P ;
Bruner, J ;
Yue, N ;
Osoba, D ;
Zaknoen, S ;
Levin, VA .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2000, 83 (05) :588-593