Sorption of Cs+ to micaceous subsurface sediments from the Hanford site, USA

被引:286
作者
Zachara, JM [1 ]
Smith, SC [1 ]
Liu, CX [1 ]
McKinley, JP [1 ]
Serne, RJ [1 ]
Gassman, PL [1 ]
机构
[1] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0016-7037(01)00759-1
中图分类号
P3 [地球物理学]; P59 [地球化学];
学科分类号
0708 ; 070902 ;
摘要
The sorption of Cs+ was investigated over a large concentration range (10(-9)-10(-2) mol/L) on subsurface sediments from a United States nuclear materials site (Hanford) where high-level nuclear wastes (HLW) have been accidentally released to the vadose zone. The sediment sorbs large amounts of radiocesium, but expedited migration has been observed when HLW (a NaNO3 brine) is the carrier. Cs+ sorption was measured on homoionic sediments (Na+, K+, Ca2+) with electrolyte concentrations ranging from 0.01 to 1.0 mol/L. In Na+ electrolyte, concentrations were extended to near saturation with NaNO3(s) (7.0 mol/L. The sediment contained nonexpansible (biotite, muscovite) and expansible (vermiculite, smectite) phyllosilicates. The sorption data were interpreted according to the frayed edge-planar site conceptual model. A four-parameter, two-site (high- and low-affinity) numeric ion exchange model was effective in describing the sorption data. The high-affinity sites were ascribed to wedge zones on the micas where particle edges have partially expanded due to the removal of interlayer cations during weathering, and the low-affinity ones to planar sites on the expansible clays. The electrolyte cations competed with Cs+ for both high- and low-affinity sites according to the trend K+ >> Na+ greater than or equal to Ca2+. At high salt concentration, Cs+ adsorption occurred only on high-affinity sites. Na+ was an effective competitor for the high-affinity sites at high salt concentrations. In select experiments, silver-thiourea (AgTU) was used as a blocking agent to further isolate and characterize the high-affinity sites, but the method was found to be problematic. Mica particles were handpicked from the sediment, contacted with Cs-(aq)(+), and analyzed by electron microprobe to identify phases and features important to Cs+ sorption. The microprobe study implied that biotite was the primary contributor of high-affinity sites because of its weathered periphery. The poly-phase sediment exhibited close similarity in ion selectivity to illite, which has been well studied, although its proportion of high-affinity sites relative to the cation exchange capacity (CEC) was lower than that of illite. Important insights are provided on how Na+ in HLW and indigenous K+ displaced from the sediments may act to expedite the migration of strongly sorbing Cs+ in subsurface environments. Copyright (C) 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:193 / 211
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   ISOTOPIC AND CONVENTIONAL DETERMINATION OF EXCHANGEABLE SODIUM PERCENTAGE OF SOIL IN RELATION TO PLANT GROWTH [J].
BABCOCK, KL ;
SCHULZ, RK .
SOIL SCIENCE, 1970, 109 (01) :19-&
[2]   CESIUM AND RUBIDIUM ION EQUILIBRIA IN ILLITE CLAY [J].
BROUWER, E ;
BAEYENS, B ;
MAES, A ;
CREMERS, A .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY, 1983, 87 (07) :1213-1219
[3]   MOBILIZATION OF RADIOCESIUM IN PORE WATER OF LAKE-SEDIMENTS [J].
COMANS, RNJ ;
MIDDELBURG, JJ ;
ZONDERHUIS, J ;
WOITTIEZ, JRW ;
DELANGE, GJ ;
DAS, HA ;
VANDERWEIJDEN, CH .
NATURE, 1989, 339 (6223) :367-369
[4]   KINETICS OF CESIUM SORPTION ON ILLITE [J].
COMANS, RNJ ;
HOCKLEY, DE .
GEOCHIMICA ET COSMOCHIMICA ACTA, 1992, 56 (03) :1157-1164
[5]  
COMANS RNJ, 1991, GEOCHIM COSMOCHIM AC, V55, P433
[6]   ADSORPTION OF CESIUM ON MINERALS - A REVIEW [J].
CORNELL, RM .
JOURNAL OF RADIOANALYTICAL AND NUCLEAR CHEMISTRY-ARTICLES, 1993, 171 (02) :483-500
[7]   QUANTITATIVE-ANALYSIS OF RADIOCESIUM RETENTION IN SOILS [J].
CREMERS, A ;
ELSEN, A ;
DEPRETER, P ;
MAES, A .
NATURE, 1988, 335 (6187) :247-249
[8]  
DEKONING A, 2001, IN PRESS WATER RES
[9]  
DEPRETER P, 1991, RADIOCHIM ACTA, V52-3, P299
[10]   CATION EXCHANGE SELECTIVITY OF SOME CLAY-SIZED MINERALS AND SOIL MATERIALS [J].
DOLCATER, DL ;
LOTSE, EG ;
SYERS, JK ;
JACKSON, ML .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA PROCEEDINGS, 1968, 32 (06) :795-+