Geographic morbidity differentials in the late nineteenth-century United States

被引:8
作者
Elman, C [1 ]
Myers, GC
机构
[1] Univ Akron, Dept Sociol, Akron, OH 44325 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Ctr Demog Studies, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2307/2648082
中图分类号
C921 [人口统计学];
学科分类号
摘要
We use a national cross-sectional database, the 1880 Integrated Public Use Microdata Sample, to examine aggregate patterns and individual-level estimates of chronic-disease morbidity and long-term disability in the United States in the late nineteenth century. Despite higher levels of urban mortality in 1880, morbidity prevalence pales were highest in the rural areas of the country, especially in the western and the southern regions. Equations using microdata show that the estimated risk of chronic disease and impairment was highest for males and females who were older, of lower socioeconomic status, or from rural areas. This era was marked by geographically uneven but significant levels of endemic chronic disease, likely the outcomes of prior episodes of infectious disease and exposure to conditions generated by human action, such as the Civil War and migration.
引用
收藏
页码:429 / 443
页数:15
相关论文
共 63 条
[1]   FRAILTY, SICKNESS, AND DEATH - MODELS OF MORBIDITY AND MORTALITY IN HISTORICAL POPULATIONS [J].
ALTER, G ;
RILEY, JC .
POPULATION STUDIES-A JOURNAL OF DEMOGRAPHY, 1989, 43 (01) :25-45
[2]  
ALTER G, 1995, AGING PAST DEMOGRAPH, P273
[3]  
[Anonymous], W WOMEN FRONTIER EXP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[5]  
BRINKLEY GL, 1994, EC IMPACT DIS AM S 1
[6]  
CATER C, 1993, HIST REG CAUS DEATH
[7]  
Coale Ansley J., 1963, NEW ESTIMATES FERTIL
[8]   African and European bound labor in the British New World: The biological consequences of economic choices [J].
Coelho, PRP ;
McGuire, RA .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC HISTORY, 1997, 57 (01) :83-115
[10]   MORTALITY DIFFERENTIALS BETWEEN RURAL AND URBAN AREAS OF STATES IN THE NORTHEASTERN UNITED-STATES 1890-1900 [J].
CONDRAN, GA ;
CRIMMINS, E .
JOURNAL OF HISTORICAL GEOGRAPHY, 1980, 6 (02) :179-202