Predictors of pessimistic breast cancer risk perceptions in a primary care population

被引:72
作者
Davids, SL
Schapira, MM
McAuliffe, TL
Nattinger, AB
机构
[1] Med Coll Wisconsin, Dept Med, Div Gen Internal Med, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
[2] Med Coll Wisconsin, Div Biostat, Milwaukee, WI 53226 USA
关键词
breast neoplasm; risk perception; pessimism; numeracy;
D O I
10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.20801.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To identify sociodemographic characteristics, numeracy level, and breast cancer risk factors that are independently associated with the accuracy of lifetime and 5-year breast cancer risk perceptions. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. A probability scale was used to measure lifetime and 5-year risk perceptions. The absolute difference between perceived risk and the Gail model risk of breast cancer was calculated. Linear regression models were built to predict lifetime and 5-year breast cancer risk estimation error. SETTING: Primary care internal medicine practices (N = 2). PARTICIPANTS: Two hundred fifty-four women 40 to 85 years of age. RESULTS: The mean lifetime and 5-year calculated breast cancer risk was 8.4% (SD [standard deviation] 6.1) and 1.5% (SD 1.3), respectively. Subjects had a mean estimation error for lifetime and 5-year risk of 29.5% (SD 22.9) and 24.8% (SD 23.9), respectively. In multivariate analyses, lower numeracy scores (0.005), higher number of previous breast biopsies (0.016), and a higher number of first-degree relatives (0.054) were predictive of larger estimation error for lifetime breast cancer risk. White race (0.014), lower educational levels (0.009), higher number of previous breast biopsies (0.008), and higher number of first-degree relatives (0.014) were predictive of larger estimation error for 5-year risk. CONCLUSION: Among a primary care population, breast cancer risk factors may be more consistently associated with pessimistic perceptions of breast cancer risk than other factors studied during a lifetime and 5-year time span. Primary care physicians should consider counseling patients about individual breast cancer risk factors and risk over time.
引用
收藏
页码:310 / 315
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]   The effect of an educational intervention on the perceived risk of breast cancer [J].
Alexander, NE ;
Ross, J ;
Sumner, W ;
Nease, RF ;
Littenberg, B .
JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1996, 11 (02) :92-97
[2]   Graphs to estimate an individualized risk of breast cancer [J].
Benichou, J ;
Gail, MH ;
Mulvihill, JJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1996, 14 (01) :103-110
[3]   PERCEPTIONS OF BREAST-CANCER RISK AND SCREENING EFFECTIVENESS IN WOMEN YOUNGER THAN 50 YEARS OF AGE [J].
BLACK, WC ;
NEASE, RF ;
TOSTESON, ANA .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1995, 87 (10) :720-731
[4]  
Bowen D, 1997, Womens Health, V3, P227
[5]   Validation studies for models projecting the risk of invasive and total breast cancer incidence [J].
Costantino, JP ;
Gail, MH ;
Pee, D ;
Anderson, S ;
Redmond, CK ;
Benichou, J ;
Wieand, HS .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1999, 91 (18) :1541-1548
[6]   Gall model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior [J].
Daly, MB ;
Lerman, CL ;
Ross, E ;
Schwartz, MD ;
Sands, CB ;
Masny, A .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 41 (01) :59-70
[7]  
DIEFENBACH MA, 1993, HEALTH EDUC RES, V8, P181, DOI 10.1093/her/8.2.181
[8]  
Eiser JR, 1998, BRIT MED BULL, V54, P779
[9]   Tamoxifen for prevention of breast cancer: Report of the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project P-1 study [J].
Fisher, B ;
Costantino, JP ;
Wickerham, DL ;
Redmond, CK ;
Kavanah, M ;
Cronin, WM ;
Vogel, V ;
Robidoux, A ;
Dimitrov, N ;
Atkins, J ;
Daly, M ;
Wieand, S ;
Tan-Chiu, E ;
Ford, L ;
Wolmark, N .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (18) :1371-1388
[10]   PROJECTING INDIVIDUALIZED PROBABILITIES OF DEVELOPING BREAST-CANCER FOR WHITE FEMALES WHO ARE BEING EXAMINED ANNUALLY [J].
GAIL, MH ;
BRINTON, LA ;
BYAR, DP ;
CORLE, DK ;
GREEN, SB ;
SCHAIRER, C ;
MULVIHILL, JJ .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1989, 81 (24) :1879-1886