Separate and unequal: Residential segregation and estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics in US metropolitan areas

被引:303
作者
Morello-Frosch, R
Jesdale, BM
机构
[1] Brown Univ, Ctr Environm Studies, Providence, RI 02912 USA
[2] Brown Univ, Sch Med, Dept Community Hlth, Providence, RI 02912 USA
关键词
air toxics; cancer risk; environmental justice; health disparity; racial disparity; segregation;
D O I
10.1289/ehp.8500
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This study examines links between racial residential segregation and estimated ambient air toxics exposures and their associated cancer risks using modeled concentration estimates from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's National Air Toxics Assessment. We combined pollutant concentration estimates with potencies to calculate cancer risks by census tract for 309 metropolitan areas in the United States. This information was combined with socioeconomic status (SES) measures from the 1990 Census. Estimated cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics were highest in tracts located in metropolitan areas that were highly segregated. Disparities between racial/ethnic groups were also wider in more segregated metropolitan areas. Multivariate modeling showed that, after controlling for tract-level SES measures, increasing segregation amplified the cancer risks associated with ambient air toxics for all racial groups combined [highly segregated areas: relative cancer risk (RCR)=1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.01-107; extremely segregated areas: RCR=1.32; 95% CI, 1.28-1.36]. This segregation effect was strongest for Hispanics (highly segregated areas: RCR=1.09; 95% CI, 1.01-1.17; extremely segregated areas: RCR=1.74; 95% CI, 1.61-1.88) and weaker among whites (highly segregated areas: RCR=1.04; 95% CI, 1.01-1.08; extremely segregated areas: RCR=1.28; 95% CI, 1.24-1.33), African Americans (highly segregated areas: RCR=1.09; 95% CI, 0.98-1.21; extremely segregated areas: RCR=1.38; 95% CI, 1.24-1.53), and Asians (highly segregated areas: RCR=1.10; 95% CI, 0.97-1.24; extremely segregated areas: RCR=1.32; 95% CI, 1.16-1.51). Results suggest that disparities associated with ambient air toxics are affected by segregation and that these exposures may have health significance for populations across racial lines.
引用
收藏
页码:386 / 393
页数:8
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]   Future directions in residential segregation and health research: A multilevel approach [J].
Acevedo-Garcia, D ;
Lochner, KA ;
Osypuk, TL ;
Subramanian, SV .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (02) :215-221
[2]   Zip code-level risk factors for tuberculosis: Neighborhood environment and residential segregation in New Jersey, 1985-1992 [J].
Acevedo-Garcia, D .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2001, 91 (05) :734-741
[3]   Socioeconomic and racial disparities in cancer risk from air toxics in Maryland [J].
Apelberg, BJ ;
Buckley, TJ ;
White, RH .
ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH PERSPECTIVES, 2005, 113 (06) :693-699
[4]  
Burke L.M., 1993, Geographic Information Systems, V3, P44
[5]  
*CA OFF ENV HLTH H, 2002, HOT SPOT UN RISK POT
[6]   Segregation and mortality: The deadly effects of racism? [J].
Collins, CA ;
Williams, DR .
SOCIOLOGICAL FORUM, 1999, 14 (03) :495-523
[7]   RESIDENTIAL SEGREGATION IN URBANIZED AREAS OF UNITED-STATES IN 1970 - ANALYSIS OF SOCIAL-CLASS AND RACIAL-DIFFERENCES [J].
FARLEY, R .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1977, 14 (04) :497-518
[8]   Latino, Asian, and black segregation in US metropolitan areas: Are multiethnic metros different? [J].
Frey, WH ;
Farley, R .
DEMOGRAPHY, 1996, 33 (01) :35-50
[9]   Urban sprawl and public health [J].
Frumkin, H .
PUBLIC HEALTH REPORTS, 2002, 117 (03) :201-217
[10]   Healthy places: Exploring the evidence [J].
Frumkin, H .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2003, 93 (09) :1451-1456