Sexual function and bother after radical prostatectomy or radiation for prostate cancer: Multivariate quality-of-life analysis from CaPSURE

被引:198
作者
Litwin, MS
Flanders, SC
Pasta, DJ
Stoddard, ML
Lubeck, DP
Henning, JM
机构
[1] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Urol, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[2] Univ Calif Los Angeles, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Serv, Los Angeles, CA 90095 USA
[3] Univ Calif San Francisco, Sch Med, Dept Urol, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[4] TAP Holdings Inc, Deerfield, IL USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0090-4295(99)00172-7
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Objectives. To measure the effect of treatment choice (pelvic irradiation [XRT] versus radical prostatectomy [RP] with or without nerve sparing) on sexual function and sexual bother during the first 2 years after treatment. Methods. We studied sexual function and sexual bother in 438 men recently diagnosed with early-stage prostate cancer and treated with XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing. Outcomes were assessed with the University of California, Los Angeles Prostate Cancer Index, a validated health-related quality-of-life instrument that includes these two domains. To minimize the influence of other factors, we adjusted for age, comorbidity, general health, and previous treatment for erectile dysfunction. All subjects were drawn from CaPSURE, a national, longitudinal data base. Results. Sexual function improved over time during the first year in all treatment groups; however, during the second year, sexual function began to decline in the XRT group. Older patients who received XRT showed substantial declines in sexual function throughout the 2 years, and older patients who underwent RP experienced a return of very low baseline sexual function. Sexual function was improved by the use of nerve-sparing procedures or erectile aids. Alterations in sexual bother were ameliorated by many factors, including age, general health perceptions, and sexual function. Conclusions, Patients undergoing XRT or RP with or without nerve sparing all showed comparable rates of improvement in sexual function during the first year after treatment for early-stage prostate cancer. However, in the second year after treatment, patients treated with XRT began to show declining sexual function; patients treated with RP did not. (C) 1999, Elsevier Science Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:503 / 508
页数:6
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   How is quality of life in prostate cancer patients influenced by modern treatment? The Wallenberg Symposium [J].
Altwein, J ;
Ekman, P ;
Barry, M ;
Biermann, C ;
Carlsson, P ;
Fossa, S ;
Kiebert, G ;
Kuchler, T ;
McLeod, D ;
Porter, A ;
Steineck, G .
UROLOGY, 1997, 49 (4A) :66-76
[2]   Complications after treatment with external-beam irradiation in early-stage prostate cancer patients: A prospective multiinstitutional outcomes study [J].
Beard, CJ ;
Propert, KJ ;
Rieker, PP ;
Clark, JA ;
Kaplan, I ;
Kantoff, PW ;
Talcott, JA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1997, 15 (01) :223-229
[3]   Changes in sexual function after radiotherapy treatment of prostate cancer [J].
Beckendorf, V ;
Hay, M ;
Rozan, R ;
Lagrange, JL ;
NGuyen, T ;
Giraud, B .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 77 (01) :118-123
[4]   QUALITY-OF-LIFE 12 MONTHS AFTER RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY [J].
BRASLIS, KG ;
SANTACRUZ, C ;
BRICKMAN, AL ;
SOLOWAY, MS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1995, 75 (01) :48-53
[5]   Assessment of quality of life after radical radiotherapy for prostate cancer [J].
Caffo, O ;
Fellin, G ;
Graffer, U ;
Luciani, L .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 1996, 78 (04) :557-563
[6]  
DASILVA FC, 1993, CANCER, V72, P3803
[7]   EFFECT OF RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY FOR PROSTATE-CANCER ON PATIENT QUALITY-OF-LIFE - RESULTS FROM A MEDICARE SURVEY [J].
FOWLER, FJ ;
BARRY, MJ ;
LUYAO, G ;
WASSON, J ;
ROMAN, A ;
WENNBERG, J .
UROLOGY, 1995, 45 (06) :1007-1013
[8]   THE IMPORTANCE OF COEXISTENT DISEASE IN THE OCCURRENCE OF POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS AND ONE-YEAR RECOVERY IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING TOTAL HIP-REPLACEMENT - COMORBIDITY AND OUTCOMES AFTER HIP-REPLACEMENT [J].
GREENFIELD, S ;
APOLONE, G ;
MCNEIL, BJ ;
CLEARY, PD .
MEDICAL CARE, 1993, 31 (02) :141-154
[9]   MEASUREMENT OF HEALTH-STATUS - ASCERTAINING THE MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE [J].
JAESCHKE, R ;
SINGER, J ;
GUYATT, GH .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1989, 10 (04) :407-415
[10]   DETERMINING A MINIMAL IMPORTANT CHANGE IN A DISEASE-SPECIFIC QUALITY-OF-LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE [J].
JUNIPER, EF ;
GUYATT, GH ;
WILLAN, A ;
GRIFFITH, LE .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1994, 47 (01) :81-87