A methodology for spatial uncertainty analysis of remote sensing and GIS products

被引:26
作者
Wang, GX
Gertner, GZ
Fang, SF
Anderson, AB
机构
[1] Univ Illinois, Dept Nat Resources & Environm Sci, Urbana, IL 61801 USA
[2] USA, Corps Engineers, CERL, Champaign, IL 61826 USA
关键词
D O I
10.14358/PERS.71.12.1423
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
When remote sensing and GIS products ore generated, errors and uncertainties from collection, processing and analysis of image and ground data, and model development, accumulate and are propagated to the maps. The products thus possess many sources of uncertainties that vary spatially and temporally. Spatially identifying the sources of uncertainties, modeling their accumulation and propagation, and finally, quantifying them will be critical to control the quality of spatial data. This paper demonstrates a methodology and its applications for a case study in which uncertainty of predicted soil erosion is hierarchically partitioned into various primary components on a pixel-by-pixel basis. The methodology is based on a regionalized variable theory of variables. It integrates remote sensing aided co-simulation algorithms in geo-statistics, and uncertainty and error budget methods in uncertainty analysis. The simulation algorithms generate realizations that can be used to calculate local estimates, and the variances and co-variances between them. Uncertainty and error budget methods partition the uncertainty of output into various input components and quantify their relative uncertainty contributions. The results can thus suggest the main uncertainty sources and their variation spatially, and further provide a rationale to reduce errors in map generation and application.
引用
收藏
页码:1423 / 1432
页数:10
相关论文
共 52 条
[1]   JOINT SIMULATION OF MULTIPLE-VARIABLES WITH A MARKOV-TYPE COREGIONALIZATION MODEL [J].
ALMEIDA, AS ;
JOURNEL, AG .
MATHEMATICAL GEOLOGY, 1994, 26 (05) :565-588
[2]  
Campbell J.B., 1996, INTRO REMOTE SENSING
[3]  
CHRISMAN NR, 1992, ACCURACY SPATIAL DAT, P21
[4]  
CONGALTON RG, 1988, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V54, P587
[5]  
Csillag F, 1996, INT J GEOGR INF SYST, V10, P851, DOI 10.1080/026937996137756
[6]   STUDY OF SENSITIVITY OF COUPLED REACTION SYSTEMS TO UNCERTAINTIES IN RATE COEFFICIENTS .1. THEORY [J].
CUKIER, RI ;
FORTUIN, CM ;
SHULER, KE ;
PETSCHEK, AG ;
SCHAIBLY, JH .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1973, 59 (08) :3873-3878
[7]  
DAVIS FW, 1991, PHOTOGRAMM ENG REM S, V57, P689
[8]  
Deutsch C.V., 1998, GSLIB GEOSTATISTICAL
[9]  
DUNGAN JL, 1994, ENV INFORMATION MANA, P237
[10]   Improved generalized Fourier amplitude sensitivity test (FAST) for model assessment [J].
Fang, SF ;
Gertner, GZ ;
Shinkareva, S ;
Wang, GX ;
Anderson, A .
STATISTICS AND COMPUTING, 2003, 13 (03) :221-226