Problems of weak electromagnetic field effects in cell biology

被引:97
作者
Berg, H
机构
[1] Lab Bioelectrochem, D-07745 Jena, Germany
[2] Saxonian Acad Sci, Leipzig, Germany
来源
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS | 1999年 / 48卷 / 02期
关键词
electromagnetic field effects; cell biology; electrical window;
D O I
10.1016/S0302-4598(99)00012-4
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Electrostimulations of cells by weak electric or electromagnetic LIF and HF-fields are applied widely today; capacitively or inductively coupled, however, they are seldom applied for cell-free and membrane-free solutions of enzymes. First, the detection of a response of the cells ('electrical window') is a prerequisite for testing at least three parameters: frequency, amplitude and treatment time, besides reproducible biological conditions. The 'state-of-the-art' of this fast developing direction of bioelectrochemistry can be characterized in the following way: the results from several laboratories of (a) cell proliferation, (b) ion transport, (c) activation of several enzymes (Na,K-ATPase), (d) increase of certain protein concentrations (heat-shock protein hsp70) are more or less in agreement. Unfortunately, there are discrepancies between no less than 7 labs in the gene expression of c-myc, c-fos histone 2B, -actin, URA-3 and others, especially for low fields (< 0.05 mT), e.g., in HL60 cells! The reason why seems to be: (1) differences in the most suitable isolation procedure, (2) interferences in the case of too low magnetic flux and (3) too small ranges of parameters have been measured. Today, three open problems must be pointed out: (A) What is the physiological causality for specific 'electrical windows' and their positive or negative efficacy? (B) What are the biochemical targets for either magnetic or electric fields or both? (C) What is the influence of electrical and (or) thermal noise on field efficiency? (C) 1999 Elsevier Science S.A. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:355 / 360
页数:6
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Hypothetical biophysical mechanisms for the action of weak low frequency electromagnetic fields at the cellular level [J].
Adair, RK .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 1997, 72 (3-4) :271-278
[2]   DIRECT ELECTRIC-FIELD EFFECTS AND SEQUENTIAL PROCESSES IN BIOSYSTEMS [J].
ASTUMIAN, D ;
BERG, H .
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1991, 25 (03) :455-462
[3]  
BERG H, 1993, ELECTRO MAGNETOBIOL, V12, P147, DOI 10.3109/15368379309012869
[4]   POSSIBILITIES AND PROBLEMS OF LOW-FREQUENCY WEAK ELECTROMAGNETIC-FIELDS IN CELL BIOLOGY [J].
BERG, H .
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1995, 38 (01) :153-159
[5]  
BERG H, 1997, AKAD WISS LEIPZIG MA, V126, P1
[6]  
DENNIS J, 1997, RAD PROTECTION DOSIM, V72
[7]   ELECTROSTIMULATION OF YEAST PROLIFERATION [J].
FIEDLER, U ;
GROBNER, U ;
BERG, H .
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1995, 38 (02) :423-425
[8]  
GUSTAVSON M, 1999, P 2 WORLD C EL MAGN
[9]   Electrostimulation of proliferation of the denitrifying bacterium Pseudomonas stutzeri [J].
Hones, I ;
Pospischil, A ;
Berg, H .
BIOELECTROCHEMISTRY AND BIOENERGETICS, 1998, 44 (02) :275-277
[10]   CALCIUM SIGNALING IN LYMPHOCYTES AND ELF FIELDS - EVIDENCE FOR AN ELECTRIC-FIELD METRIC AND A SITE OF INTERACTION INVOLVING THE CALCIUM-ION CHANNEL [J].
LIBURDY, RP .
FEBS LETTERS, 1992, 301 (01) :53-59