Validating the use of two-item measures of pain beliefs and coping strategies for a veteran population

被引:47
作者
Tan, G
Nguyen, Q
Cardin, SA
Jensen, MP
机构
[1] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Chron Pain Program, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Michael E DeBakey VA Med Ctr, Mental Hlth Consultat & Specialized Evaluat Progr, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[3] Baylor Coll Med, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[4] Univ Washington, Sch Med, Dept Rehabil Med, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
chronic pain; coping; validity; veteran population;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpain.2005.11.007
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Previous research has demonstrated that 2-item versions of subscales from the Chronic Pain Coping Inventory, Coping Strategy Questionnaire, and the Survey of Pain Attitudes appear adequately reliable and valid for use in studies with large sample sizes. It was suggested that use of the abbreviated scales might help to expand the testing and application of cognitive-behavioral models of pain to new settings and with new populations where assessment burden might be a key issue. This study explored the utility of these brief scales among veterans in a Veterans Affairs setting. Strong associations were found between the 2-item versions and their respective parent scales. In addition, the 2-item scales were found to be associated with other pain-related measures, supporting their predictive validity. The results of this study replicate previous findings and offer support for the use of the 2-item versions for both screening and research purposes in Veterans Affairs settings with a veteran population. Perspective: This article presents the psychometric properties of brief versions of 3 commonly used pain coping and belief questionnaires in a unique population. These measures could be used clinically for initial screening purposes, as well as for treatment monitoring. (C) 2006 by the American Pain Society.
引用
收藏
页码:252 / 260
页数:9
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]
DAILY COPING WITH PAIN FROM RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - PATTERNS AND CORRELATES [J].
AFFLECK, G ;
URROWS, S ;
TENNEN, H ;
HIGGINS, P .
PAIN, 1992, 51 (02) :221-229
[2]
[Anonymous], 2001, HDB PAIN ASSESSMENT
[3]
ASHBY JS, 1994, REHABIL PSYCHOL, V39, P205, DOI 10.1037/h0080317
[4]
PAIN COPING STRATEGIES IN RHEUMATOID-ARTHRITIS - RELATIONSHIPS TO PAIN, DISABILITY, DEPRESSION AND DAILY HASSLES [J].
BECKHAM, JC ;
KEEFE, FJ ;
CALDWELL, DS ;
ROODMAN, AA .
BEHAVIOR THERAPY, 1991, 22 (01) :113-124
[5]
Boothby J. L., 1999, PSYCHOSOCIAL FACTORS, P343
[7]
Predictive utility of the CSQ in low back pain: Individual vs composite measures [J].
Dozois, DJA ;
Dobson, KS ;
Wong, M ;
Hughes, D ;
Long, A .
PAIN, 1996, 66 (2-3) :171-180
[8]
ASSESSMENT OF PAIN-RELATED COGNITIONS IN CHRONIC PAIN PATIENTS [J].
FLOR, H ;
BEHLE, DJ ;
BIRBAUMER, N .
BEHAVIOUR RESEARCH AND THERAPY, 1993, 31 (01) :63-73
[9]
Assessing depression among persons with chronic pain using the center for epidemiological studies depression scale and the beck depression inventory: A comparative analysis [J].
Geisser, ME ;
Roth, RS ;
Robinson, ME .
CLINICAL JOURNAL OF PAIN, 1997, 13 (02) :163-170
[10]
CATASTROPHIZING, DEPRESSION AND THE SENSORY, AFFECTIVE AND EVALUATIVE ASPECTS OF CHRONIC PAIN [J].
GEISSER, ME ;
ROBINSON, ME ;
KEEFE, FJ ;
WEINER, ML .
PAIN, 1994, 59 (01) :79-83