Breast and ovarian cancer in relatives of cancer patients, with and without BRCA mutations

被引:31
作者
Lee, JS
John, EM
McGuire, V
Felberg, A
Ostrow, KL
DiCioccio, RA
Li, FP
Miron, A
West, DW
Whittemore, AS
机构
[1] Stanford Univ, Sch Med, Dept Hlth Res & Policy, Div Epidemiol, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[2] Univ Calif San Francisco, Div Endocrinol & Metab, San Francisco, CA 94143 USA
[3] No Calif Canc Ctr, Fremont, CA USA
[4] Roswell Pk Canc Inst, Dept Canc Genet, Buffalo, NY 14263 USA
[5] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Epidemiol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
[6] Dana Farber Canc Inst, Dept Canc Biol, Boston, MA 02115 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0687
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: First-degree relatives of patients with breast or ovarian cancer have increased risks for these cancers. Little is known about how their risks vary with the patient's cancer site, carrier status for predisposing genetic mutations, or age at cancer diagnosis. Methods: We evaluated breast and ovarian cancer incidence in 2,935 female first-degree relatives of non-Hispanic White female patients with incident invasive cancers of the breast (n = 669) or ovary (n = 339) who were recruited from a population-based cancer registry in northern California. Breast cancer patients were tested for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. Ovarian cancer patients were tested for BRCA1 mutations. We estimated standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% Cl) for breast and ovarian cancer among the relatives according to the patient's mutation status, cancer site, and age at cancer diagnosis. Results: In families of patients who were negative or untested for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, risks were elevated only for the patient's cancer site. The breast cancer SIR was 1.5 (95% Cl, 1.2-1.8) for relatives of breast cancer patients, compared with 1.1 (95% Cl, 0.8-1.6) for relatives of ovarian cancer patients (P = 0.12 for difference by patient's cancer site). The ovarian cancer SIR was 0.9 (95% Cl, 0.5-1.4) for relatives of breast cancer patients, compared with 1.9 (95% Cl, 1.0-4.0) for relatives of ovarian cancer patients (P = 0.04 for difference by site). In families of BRCA1-positive patients, relatives' risks also correlated with the patient's cancer site. The breast cancer SIR was 10.6 (95% Cl, 5.2-21.6) for relatives of breast cancer patients, compared with 3.3 (95% Cl, 1.4-7.3) for relatives of ovarian cancer patients (two-sided P = 0.02 for difference by site). The ovarian cancer SIR was 7.9 (95% Cl, 1.2-53.0) for relatives of breast cancer patients, compared with 11.3 (3.6-35.9) for relatives of ovarian cancer patients (two-sided P = 0.37 for difference by site). Relatives' risks were independent of patients' ages at diagnosis, with one exception: In families ascertained through a breast cancer patient without BRCA mutations, breast cancer risks were higher if the patient had been diagnosed before age 40 years. Conclusion: In families of patients with and without BRCA1 mutations, breast and ovarian cancer risks correlate with the patient's cancer site. Moreover, in families of breast cancer patients without BRCA mutations, breast cancer risk depends on the patient's age at diagnosis. These patterns support the presence of genes that modify risk specific to cancer site, in both carriers and noncarriers of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 363
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]   Average risks of breast and ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations detected in case series unselected for family history:: A combined analysis of 22 studies [J].
Antoniou, A ;
Pharoah, PDP ;
Narod, S ;
Risch, HA ;
Eyfjord, JE ;
Hopper, JL ;
Loman, N ;
Olsson, H ;
Johannsson, O ;
Borg, Å ;
Pasini, B ;
Radice, P ;
Manoukian, S ;
Eccles, DM ;
Tang, N ;
Olah, E ;
Anton-Culver, H ;
Warner, E ;
Lubinski, J ;
Gronwald, J ;
Gorski, B ;
Tulinius, H ;
Thorlacius, S ;
Eerola, H ;
Nevanlinna, H ;
Syrjäkoski, K ;
Kallioniemi, OP ;
Thompson, D ;
Evans, C ;
Peto, J ;
Lalloo, F ;
Evans, DG ;
Easton, DF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN GENETICS, 2003, 72 (05) :1117-1130
[2]   Familial breast cancer: collaborative reanalysis of individual data from 52 epidemiological studies including 58 209 women with breast cancer and 101 986 women without the disease [J].
Beral, V ;
Bull, D ;
Doll, R ;
Peto, R ;
Reeves, G .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9291) :1389-1399
[3]   Risk of ovarian cancer in breast-cancer patients with a family history of breast or ovarian cancer:: a population-based cohort study [J].
Bergfeldt, K ;
Rydh, B ;
Granath, F ;
Grönberg, H ;
Thalib, L ;
Adami, HO ;
Hall, P .
LANCET, 2002, 360 (9337) :891-894
[4]   Effect of BRCA1 and BRCA2 on the association between breast cancer risk and family history [J].
Claus, EB ;
Schildkraut, J ;
Iversen, ES ;
Berry, D ;
Parmigiani, G .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1998, 90 (23) :1824-1829
[5]   FAMILY HISTORY, AGE, AND RISK OF BREAST-CANCER - PROSPECTIVE DATA FROM THE NURSES HEALTH STUDY [J].
COLDITZ, GA ;
WILLETT, WC ;
HUNTER, DJ ;
STAMPFER, MJ ;
MANSON, JE ;
HENNEKENS, CH ;
ROSNER, BA ;
SPEIZER, FE .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1993, 270 (03) :338-343
[6]  
DiCioccio RA, 1996, CLIN GENET, V50, P108
[7]   Familial risks, early-onset breast cancer, and BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations [J].
Dite, GS ;
Jenkins, MA ;
Southey, MC ;
Hocking, JS ;
Giles, GG ;
McCredie, MRE ;
Venter, DJ ;
Hopper, JL .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2003, 95 (06) :448-457
[8]   Interpreting epidemiological research:: blinded comparison of methods used to estimate the prevalence of inherited mutations in BRCA1 [J].
Eng, C ;
Brody, LC ;
Wagner, TMU ;
Devilee, P ;
Vijg, J ;
Szabo, C ;
Tavtigian, SV ;
Nathanson, KL ;
Ostrander, E ;
Frank, TS .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS, 2001, 38 (12) :824-833
[9]   A comparison of BRCA1 mutation analysis by direct sequencing, SSCP and DHPLC [J].
Gross, E ;
Arnold, N ;
Goette, J ;
Schwarz-Boeger, U ;
Kiechle, M .
HUMAN GENETICS, 1999, 105 (1-2) :72-78
[10]   THE ANALYSIS OF RATES AND OF SURVIVORSHIP USING LOG-LINEAR MODELS [J].
HOLFORD, TR .
BIOMETRICS, 1980, 36 (02) :299-305