Dorsal instrumentation for idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis: rod rotation versus translation

被引:40
作者
Muschik, M
Schlenzka, D
Robinson, PN
Kupferschmidt, C
机构
[1] Humboldt Univ, Charite Hosp, Dept Pediat Orthoped, Orthoped Clin, D-10098 Berlin, Germany
[2] Invalid Fdn Helsinki, Orthoped Hosp, ORTON, Helsinki, Finland
[3] Humboldt Univ, Charite Hosp, Pediat Clin, Berlin, Germany
关键词
idiopathic scoliosis; dorsal spondylodesis; surgical technique;
D O I
10.1007/s005860050136
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications among two groups of adolescent patients treated for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis with dorsal instrumentation using a unified implantation system (Universal Spinal System) were compared retrospectively. A total of 69 patients were included in the study. In 30 patients an intraoperative correction of the scoliosis was performed by translation and segmental correction (translation group, Helsinki). In 39 patients the correction was achieved according to the Cotrel-Dubousset rod rotation maneuver (rod rotation group, Berlin). The goal of the present study is to investigate whether one of the operative procedures leads to a better correction of idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis than the other. The mean follow-up interval was 30 months, with a minimum of 12 months. There were no significant preoperative differences in age (15 +/- 2 years in both groups). gender, or type of scoliosis (King types 2, 3, and 4). The preoperative radiographic measmements showed no significant differences between the two groups. In both patient groups, the thoracic primary curve, the lumbar secondary curve and the thoracic apical rotation were improved by the operation. Lumbar apical rotation and the sagittal profile were unchanged in both groups. he thoracic primary curve was corrected from 50 degrees +/- 6 degrees to 24 degrees +/- 7 degrees in the translation group and from 54 degrees +/- 11 degrees to 22 degrees +/- 11 degrees in the rod rotation group. The extent of the correction of the thoracic curve was significantly greater in the rod rotation group than in the translation group (59% vs 52% correction). In contrast, the translation procedure seems to have a more beneficial effect on spinal balance than rod rotation. Neurological complications did not occur. In both patient groups an increase in the non-instrumented lumbar curve was noted, in two cases each. In three patients from the rod rotation group the instrumentation had to be removed due to a late infection with negative microbiological results.
引用
收藏
页码:93 / 99
页数:7
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]
AEBI M, 1998, AO ASIF PRINCIPLES S
[2]
COTREL-DUBOUSSET (CD) INSTRUMENTATION FOR THE CORRECTION OF SPINAL CURVATURE - 1ST RESULTS IN SPECIAL CONSIDERATION OF DEROTATION [J].
BAUER, R ;
MOSTEGL, A ;
HINGSHAMMER, R .
ARCHIVES OF ORTHOPAEDIC AND TRAUMA SURGERY, 1988, 107 (06) :364-368
[3]
SAGITTAL PLANE ANALYSIS IN IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS PATIENTS TREATED WITH COTREL-DUBOUSSET INSTRUMENTATION [J].
BRIDWELL, KH ;
BETZ, R ;
CAPELLI, AM ;
HUSS, G ;
HARVEY, C .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (09) :921-926
[4]
CORONAL DECOMPENSATION PRODUCED BY COTREL-DUBOUSSET DEROTATION MANEUVER FOR IDIOPATHIC RIGHT THORACIC SCOLIOSIS [J].
BRIDWELL, KH ;
MCALLISTER, JW ;
BETZ, RR ;
HUSS, G ;
CLANCY, M ;
SCHOENECKER, PL .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (07) :769-777
[5]
Cervellati S, 1996, Eur Spine J, V5, P161, DOI 10.1007/BF00395507
[6]
COTREL Y, 1988, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P10
[7]
COMPUTER-TOMOGRAPHY EVALUATION OF COTREL-DUBOUSSET INSTRUMENTATION IN IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS [J].
ECKER, ML ;
BETZ, RR ;
TRENT, PS ;
MAHBOUBI, S ;
MESGARZADEH, M ;
BONAKDAPOUR, A ;
DRUMMOND, DS ;
CLANCY, M .
SPINE, 1988, 13 (10) :1141-1144
[8]
HOPF C, 1989, FORTSCHR RONTG NEUEN, V151, P408
[9]
THE EFFECT OF LUQUE SEGMENTAL SUBLAMINAR INSTRUMENTATION ON THE RIB HUMP IN IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS [J].
HULLIN, MG ;
MCMASTER, MJ ;
DRAPER, ERC ;
DUFF, ES .
SPINE, 1991, 16 (04) :402-408
[10]
THE SELECTION OF FUSION LEVELS IN THORACIC IDIOPATHIC SCOLIOSIS [J].
KING, HA ;
MOE, JH ;
BRADFORD, DS ;
WINTER, RB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 1983, 65 (09) :1302-1313