Safety and efficacy of transarterial chemoembolization in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein thrombosis

被引:206
作者
Georgiades, CS [1 ]
Hong, K [1 ]
D'Angelo, M [1 ]
Geschwind, JFH [1 ]
机构
[1] Johns Hopkins Univ Hosp, Russell H Morgan Dept Radiol & Radiol Sci, Baltimore, MD 21287 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1097/01.RVI.0000182185.47500.7A
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
PURPOSE: Despite the absence of conclusive data, portal vein (PV) thrombosis is considered a contraindication to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The purpose of our study was to establish the safety of TACE in such patients and identify key prognostic factors and survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data were prospectively collected from 32 consecutive patients with unresectable HCC and PV thrombosis who underwent treatment with TACE. History and physical examination, relevant laboratory values, and contrast material-enhanced magnetic resonance (MR) images were obtained before each TACE procedure. Repeated TACE was performed every 6 weeks unless patients developed a contraindication or MR imaging showed complete response. RESULTS: Median overall survival was 9.5 months (range, 3-50 months). Child-Pugh numerical disease stage was the prognostic factor most strongly related to survival. The 30-day mortality rate was zero and there was no evidence of TACE-related hepatic infarction or acute liver failure. The 6-, 9-, 12-, and 18-month survival rates were 60%, 47%, 25%, and 12.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PV thrombosis should not be considered a contraindication to TACE. Compared with historical control subjects who received traditional forms of treatment, the patients in the present study had extended survival. However, prospective randomized trials are necessary to show this conclusively and to show which subgroups benefit.
引用
收藏
页码:1653 / 1659
页数:7
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Treatment outcome of transcatheter arterial chemoinfusion according to anticancer agents and prognostic factors in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (TNM stage IVa) [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Han, KH ;
Park, JY ;
Youn, YH ;
Moon, CM ;
Lee, KS ;
Chon, CY ;
Moon, YM ;
Lee, DY ;
Lee, JT .
YONSEI MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2004, 45 (05) :847-858
[2]  
Allgaier HP, 1998, INT J CANCER, V79, P601, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0215(19981218)79:6<601::AID-IJC8>3.0.CO
[3]  
2-F
[4]  
CADY B, 1983, SEMIN ONCOL, V10, P127
[5]   Transarterial chemoembolization for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma:: Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Cammà, C ;
Schepis, F ;
Orlando, A ;
Albanese, M ;
Shahied, L ;
Trevisani, F ;
Andreone, P ;
Craxì, A ;
Cottone, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2002, 224 (01) :47-54
[6]   DEVELOPMENT OF PORTAL-VEIN INVASION AND ITS OUTCOME IN HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA TREATED BY TRANSCATHETER ARTERIAL CHEMOEMBOLIZATION [J].
CHEN, SC ;
HSIEH, MY ;
CHUANG, WL ;
WANG, LY ;
CHANG, WY .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1994, 9 (01) :1-6
[7]   HEPATOCELLULAR-CARCINOMA AND PORTAL-VEIN INVASION - RESULTS OF TREATMENT WITH TRANSCATHETER OILY CHEMOEMBOLIZATION [J].
CHUNG, JW ;
PARK, JH ;
HAN, JK ;
CHOI, BI ;
HAN, MC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1995, 165 (02) :315-321
[8]   Percutaneous treatment of hepatic neoplasms: A review of current techniques [J].
De Sanctis, JT ;
Goldberg, SN ;
Mueller, PR .
CARDIOVASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 1998, 21 (04) :273-296
[9]  
Georgiades C S, 2001, Tech Vasc Interv Radiol, V4, P193, DOI 10.1053/tvir.2001.28203
[10]   Chemoembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma: Where does the truth lie? [J].
Geschwind, JFH .
JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY, 2002, 13 (10) :991-994