Central venous catheter insertion: complications of different placements.

被引:34
作者
Iovino, F
Pittiruti, M
Buononato, M
Lo Schiavo, F
机构
[1] Univ Naples 2, Div Chirurg Gen & Oncol 3, I-80122 Naples, Italy
[2] Univ Cattolica Sacro Cuore, I-00168 Rome, Italy
[3] Ist Ospitalieri Cremona, I-26100 Cremona, Italy
来源
ANNALES DE CHIRURGIE | 2001年 / 126卷 / 10期
关键词
central venous catheterization; internal jugular vein catheterization; subclavian vein catheterization;
D O I
10.1016/S0003-3944(01)00653-8
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study aim: The aim of this prospective multicentric nonrandomised trial was to report the complications of the central venous catheter insertion with different techniques and to assess the advantages of the low lateral approach to the internal jugular vein, according to the technique originally, described by Jernigan et al, with our own modifications. Patients and method: From January 1993 to August 1997, 2 290 CVC (2 286 by percutaneous puncture and 4 by surgical approach) were placed. The following complications were analysed prospectively: pneumothorax, accidental arterial puncture, more than two punctures of the same VE in, necessity to shift to another venous approach, complete failure, malposition of catheter. Results: The veins the most frequently used were internal jugular vein (48.7%), femoral vein (27%) and subclavian vein (24.2%). Internal jugular vein was punctured especially by low lateral approach (75%) and subclavian vein by infraclavicular approach (92%). With these two placements, the rate of pneumothorax was 0% and 3.1 % respectively (p <0.001), the rate of accidental arterial puncture was 1% and 2.7% respectively (p <0.03) and the rate of more than two consecutive punctures was 3.1% and 6.3% respectively (p <0.008). Conclusion: On our experience, we advocate the low lateral approach to the internal jugular vein as first choice technique for venipuncture in both adults and children for both short and long-term central venous approach, because it is associated to high rate of outcome and to low rate of complications in comparison with other techniques. (C) 2001 Editions scientifiques et medicales Elsevier SAS.
引用
收藏
页码:1001 / 1006
页数:6
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
Albuquerque Junior F C, 1998, Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care, V1, P297, DOI 10.1097/00075197-199805000-00011
[2]  
BRINKMAN AJ, 1973, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V223, P182
[3]  
Conreux F, 2000, ANN FR ANESTH, V19, P171
[4]   PINCH-OFF SYNDROME - A COMPLICATION OF IMPLANTABLE SUBCLAVIAN VENOUS ACCESS DEVICES [J].
HINKE, DH ;
ZANDTSTASTNY, DA ;
GOODMAN, LR ;
QUEBBEMAN, EJ ;
KRZYWDA, EA ;
ANDRIS, DA .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 177 (02) :353-356
[5]  
James P M Jr, 1973, Am Surg, V39, P75
[6]  
Jernigan W R, 1970, Surg Gynecol Obstet, V130, P520
[7]   Implantable vascular access systems: Experience in 1500 patients with totally implanted central venous port systems [J].
Kock, HJ ;
Pietsch, M ;
Krause, U ;
Wilke, H ;
Eigler, FW .
WORLD JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1998, 22 (01) :12-16
[8]  
Lenglinger FX, 2001, WIEN KLIN WOCHENSCHR, V113, P134
[9]  
Miller JA, 1999, AM SURGEON, V65, P125
[10]  
MOGIL RA, 1967, ARCH SURG-CHICAGO, V95, P320