Is there a linear or a nonlinear relationship between rotation and configural processing of faces?

被引:49
作者
Collishaw, SM [1 ]
Hole, GJ [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sussex, Sch Cognit & Comp Sci, Brighton BN1 9QH, E Sussex, England
关键词
D O I
10.1068/p3195
中图分类号
R77 [眼科学];
学科分类号
100212 ;
摘要
Research suggests that inverted faces are harder to recognise than upright faces because of a disruption in processing their configural properties. Reasons for this difficulty were explored by investigating people's ability to identify faces at intermediate angles of rotation. Participants were asked to discriminate blurred famous and unfamiliar faces presented at nine angles. Blurred faces were used to minimise featural processing strategies, and to assess the effects of rotation that are specific to configural processing. The results indicate a linear relationship between angle of rotation and recognition accuracy. It appears that configural processing becomes gradually more disrupted the further a face is oriented away from the upright. The implications of these findings for competing explanations of the face-inversion effect are discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:287 / 296
页数:10
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Effect of image orientation and size on object recognition: Responses of single units in the macaque monkey temporal cortex [J].
Ashbridge, E ;
Perrett, DI ;
Oram, MW ;
Jellema, T .
COGNITIVE NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, 2000, 17 (1-3) :13-34
[2]  
Bachmann T., 1991, EUROPEAN J COGNITIVE, V3, P85
[3]   INVERSION AND CONFIGURATION OF FACES [J].
BARTLETT, JC ;
SEARCY, J .
COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 25 (03) :281-316
[4]   Neurocomputational bases of object and face recognition [J].
Biederman, I ;
Kalocsai, P .
PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY OF LONDON SERIES B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1997, 352 (1358) :1203-1219
[5]   EFFECT OF DISORIENTATION ON VISUAL ANALYSIS, FAMILIARITY DECISION AND SEMANTIC DECISION ON FACES [J].
BRUYER, R ;
GALVEZ, C ;
PRAIRIAL, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 1993, 84 :433-441
[6]   Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity [J].
Collishaw, SM ;
Hole, GJ .
PERCEPTION, 2000, 29 (08) :893-909
[7]   Differences in the coding of spatial relations in face identification and basic-level object recognition [J].
Cooper, EE ;
Wojan, TJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 2000, 26 (02) :470-488
[8]   Effects of high-pass and low-pass spatial filtering on face identification [J].
Costen, NP ;
Parker, DM ;
Craw, I .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1996, 58 (04) :602-612
[9]   WHY FACES ARE AND ARE NOT SPECIAL - AN EFFECT OF EXPERTISE [J].
DIAMOND, R ;
CAREY, S .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 1986, 115 (02) :107-117
[10]  
ENDO M, 1986, ASPECTS FACE PROCESS, P53