Family trees and their affinities: The visual imperative of the genealogical diagram

被引:55
作者
Bouquet, M
机构
[1] Ethnographic Museum, University of Oslo, N-0764, Oslo
来源
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL ANTHROPOLOGICAL INSTITUTE | 1996年 / 2卷 / 01期
关键词
D O I
10.2307/3034632
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
A substantial part of the study of kinship after Rivers involved visualizing relationships in systematic, comparable form. For anthropologists, the genealogical diagram is a piece of graphic shorthand whose theoretical status is rarely considered. This article pursues the visual dimension of various sorts of European 'family trees' as examples of precedents for the genealogical diagram. Rivers's transformation of pedigree into genealogy included tapping the diffuse currency of tree imagery as a taxonomic device in certain domains of European culture. Darwin had already harnessed the language of pedigree to express phylogeny, which was given graphic expression by Haeckel. Calvinist charting of Christ's earthly ancestry back to Adam expanded, in its turn, the earlier Trees of Jesse. The genealogical diagram charts kinship within ethnographic time, but owes its moral tone and visual clout to sacred, scientific and secular forerunners.
引用
收藏
页码:43 / 66
页数:24
相关论文
共 62 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1994, VISUALIZING THEORY S
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1965, INTRO SOCIAL ANTHR
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1993, RECLAIMING ENGLISH K
  • [4] [Anonymous], WHATS RELATIVE HOUSE
  • [5] [Anonymous], [No title captured]
  • [6] [Anonymous], 1984, GREAT CAT MASSACRE
  • [7] [Anonymous], SCI CULTURE
  • [8] [Anonymous], 1983, We the Tikopia: A Sociological Study of Kinship in Primitive Polynesia
  • [9] Barnard A., 1984, RES PRACTICES STUDY
  • [10] BARNES JA, 1967, CRAFT SOCIAL ANTHR