Minimal breast cancer: evaluation of histology and biological marker expression

被引:4
作者
Dublin, EA
Millis, RR
Smith, P
Bobrow, LG
机构
[1] Guys Hosp, Hedley Atkins ICRF Breast Pathol Lab, London SE1 9RT, England
[2] Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Histopathol, Cambridge CB2 2QQ, England
关键词
minimal breast cancer; differentiation; marker expression;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6690570
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Ninety-eight minimal breast cancers (MBCs) diagnosed between 1975 and 1990, and all originally considered to be invasive were found, on review, to form three groups: (a) 28 predominantly invasive carcinomas less than or equal to 10 mm ('predominant invasive'); (b) 48 predominantly ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) lesions with definite foci of invasion each less than or equal to 10 mm ('predominant DCIS'); and (c) 22 DCIS without evidence of invasion('pure DCIS'). Tumour histology and immunohistochemical expression of Ki-67, c-erbB2, p53, oestrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and Bcl-2 were compared. The major finding was the contrasting features in the two invasive groups, with significant differences in their extent of invasion (P < 0.0001), tumour grade (P = 0.03), DCIS type (P = 0.008) and in marker expression. In the predominant invasive group; the infiltrative component was usually greater than 5 mm,low-grade and associated with well-differentiated DCIS. Expression of Ki-67, c-erbB2 and p53 was generally low,and that of ER, PR and Bcl-2 high. The predominant DCIS group in contrast had a much smaller, commonly high-grade, invasive component usually with poorly differentiated DCIS and the reverse pattern of marker expression. Although not significant, survival of patients in the predominant invasive group was slightly better. These findings suggest that invasive MBCs should perhaps be treated as separate entities, in order to aid more appropriate selection of treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1616
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
ACKERMAN LV, 1977, CANCER, V39, P2755, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(197706)39:6<2755::AID-CNCR2820390663>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-J
[3]   OVEREXPRESSION OF HER-2 NEU AND ITS RELATIONSHIP WITH OTHER PROGNOSTIC FACTORS CHANGE DURING THE PROGRESSION OF INSITU TO INVASIVE BREAST-CANCER [J].
ALLRED, DC ;
CLARK, GM ;
MOLINA, R ;
TANDON, AK ;
SCHNITT, SJ ;
GILCHRIST, KW ;
OSBORNE, CK ;
TORMEY, DC ;
MCGUIRE, WL .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1992, 23 (09) :974-979
[4]  
ARNESSON LG, 1994, EUR J SURG, V160, P271
[5]   OVEREXPRESSION OF THE C-ERBB-2 ONCOPROTEIN - WHY DOES THIS OCCUR MORE FREQUENTLY IN DUCTAL CARCINOMA INSITU THAN IN INVASIVE MAMMARY-CARCINOMA AND IS THIS OF PROGNOSTIC-SIGNIFICANCE [J].
BARNES, DM ;
BARTKOVA, J ;
CAMPLEJOHN, RS ;
GULLICK, WJ ;
SMITH, PJ ;
MILLIS, RR .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1992, 28A (2-3) :644-648
[6]   IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DETECTION OF P53 PROTEIN IN MAMMARY-CARCINOMA - AN IMPORTANT NEW INDEPENDENT INDICATOR OF PROGNOSIS [J].
BARNES, DM ;
DUBLIN, EA ;
FISHER, CJ ;
LEVISON, DA ;
MILLIS, RR .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1993, 24 (05) :469-476
[7]  
Barsky SH, 1997, J PATHOL, V183, P188
[8]   IMMUNOHISTOCHEMICAL DEMONSTRATION OF C-ERBB-2-PROTEIN IN MAMMARY DUCTAL CARCINOMA INSITU [J].
BARTKOVA, J ;
BARNES, DM ;
MILLIS, RR ;
GULLICK, WJ .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1990, 21 (11) :1164-1167
[9]   NONINVASIVE DUCTAL CARCINOMA OF THE BREAST - THE RELEVANCE OF HISTOLOGIC CATEGORIZATION [J].
BELLAMY, COC ;
MCDONALD, C ;
SALTER, DM ;
CHETTY, U ;
ANDERSON, TJ .
HUMAN PATHOLOGY, 1993, 24 (01) :16-23
[10]  
BOBROW LG, 1994, SEMIN DIAGN PATHOL, V11, P215