Dynamic reserve design with the union-find algorithm

被引:11
作者
Harrison, Paul [2 ]
Spring, Daniel [1 ]
MacKenzie, Michael [3 ]
Mac Nally, Ralph [1 ]
机构
[1] Monash Univ, Australian Ctr Biodivers, Sch Biol Sci, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[2] Monash Univ, Victorian Bioinformat Consortium, Clayton, Vic 3800, Australia
[3] RMIT Univ, Sch Econ Finance & Mkt, Fac Business, Melbourne, Vic 3000, Australia
关键词
dynamic reserve design; union-find algorithm; connectivity; graph theory;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.04.003
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
When reserve networks are established over time, there is a risk that sites will be developed in areas planned for future reservation, reducing the effectiveness of reserves. We developed a dynamic reserve design model that maximizes the expected number of species conserved, taking account of the risk of future habitat loss and fragmentation. The model makes use of the union-find algorithm, which is an efficient method for maintaining a list of connected regions in a graph as nodes and edges are inserted. A simple extension of the algorithm allows us to efficiently determine, for each species, when a sequence of site selections results in a reserve in which the species can persist. The extension also allows us to determine when a sequence of deforestation events results in the species becoming non-viable. The dynamic reserve design model is much more effective than commonly used heuristics, particularly when multiple connected sites are required for species persistence. The model also is able to solve much larger problems with greater effectiveness than the only previous dynamic reserve design model that considered site connectivity relationships. The union-find algorithm has much scope for addressing ecological management problems in which dynamic connectivity needs to be considered. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:369 / 376
页数:8
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]  
Burgman M. A., 1993, RISK ASSESSMENT CONS
[2]   Habitat loss and connectivity of reserve networks in probability approaches to reserve design [J].
Cabeza, M .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2003, 6 (07) :665-672
[3]   Dynamic reserve site selection [J].
Costello, C ;
Polasky, S .
RESOURCE AND ENERGY ECONOMICS, 2004, 26 (02) :157-174
[4]   Increasing isolation of protected areas in tropical forests over the past twenty years [J].
DeFries, R ;
Hansen, A ;
Newton, AC ;
Hansen, MC .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2005, 15 (01) :19-26
[5]   Does conservation planning matter in a dynamic and uncertain world? [J].
Meir, E ;
Andelman, S ;
Possingham, HP .
ECOLOGY LETTERS, 2004, 7 (08) :615-622
[6]   A framework for assessing the relative vulnerability of species to land-use change [J].
Pereira, HM ;
Daily, GC ;
Roughgarden, J .
ECOLOGICAL APPLICATIONS, 2004, 14 (03) :730-742
[7]  
Puterman ML, 1994, MARKOV DECISION PROC
[8]   Dynamic reserve site selection under contagion risk of deforestation [J].
Sabbadin, R. ;
Spring, D. ;
Rabier, C. -E. .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 2007, 201 (01) :75-81
[9]   Integrity and isolation of Costa Rica's national parks and biological reserves:: examining the dynamics of land-cover change [J].
Sánchez-Azofeifa, GA ;
Daily, GC ;
Pfaff, ASP ;
Busch, C .
BIOLOGICAL CONSERVATION, 2003, 109 (01) :123-135
[10]  
Sedgewick R., 1990, Algorithms in C