Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke

被引:358
作者
Beninato, M
Gill-Body, KM
Salles, S
Stark, PC
Black-Schaffer, RM
Stein, J
机构
[1] MGH Inst Hlth Profess, Grad Programs Phys Therapy, Boston, MA 02129 USA
[2] Univ Kentucky, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Lexington, KY USA
[3] Tufts New England Med Ctr, Inst Clin Res & Hlth Policy Studies, Biostat Res Ctr, Boston, MA USA
[4] Spaulding Rehabil Hosp, Dept Phys Med & Rehabil, Boston, MA USA
[5] Harvard Univ, Sch Med, Boston, MA USA
来源
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION | 2006年 / 87卷 / 01期
关键词
outcome assessment (health care); rehabilitation; sensitivity and specificity; stroke;
D O I
10.1016/j.apmr.2005.08.130
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Objective: To define the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for the FIM instrument in patients poststroke. Design: Prospective case series discharged over a 9-month period. Setting: Long-term acute care hospital. Participants: Patients with stroke (N = 113). Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: Admission, discharge, and change scores were calculated for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM. Assessments of clinical change were rated at discharge on a 15-point (-7 to +7) Likert scale by attending physicians, with MCID defined at a cutoff score of 3. The FIM change scores associated with MCID were identified from receiver operating characteristic curves. Bayesian analysis was used to determine the probability of individual patients achieving MCID. Results: FIM change scores associated with MCID were 22, 17, and 3 for the total FIM, motor FIM, and cognitive FIM, respectively. The accuracy of the MCID was greater when subjects were categorized based on admission FIM scores than when considering the sample as a whole. Larger FIM change scores were related to MCID in subjects with lower admission FIM scores. Conclusions: These findings will assist in the interpretation of FIM change scores relative to physicians' assessments of important clinical change.
引用
收藏
页码:32 / 39
页数:8
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]   STROKE REHABILITATION OUTCOME - A POTENTIAL USE OF PREDICTIVE VARIABLES TO ESTABLISH LEVELS OF CARE [J].
ALEXANDER, MP .
STROKE, 1994, 25 (01) :128-134
[2]  
*AM HEART ASS, 2002, HEART DIS STROK STAT
[3]   Many faces of the minimal clinically important difference (MCID): a literature review and directions for future research [J].
Beaton, DE ;
Boers, M ;
Wells, GA .
CURRENT OPINION IN RHEUMATOLOGY, 2002, 14 (02) :109-114
[4]   Understanding the relevance of measured change through studies of responsiveness [J].
Beaton, DE .
SPINE, 2000, 25 (24) :3192-3199
[5]  
Beaton DE, 2001, J RHEUMATOL, V28, P400
[6]   ASSESSING THE RESPONSIVENESS OF FUNCTIONAL SCALES TO CLINICAL-CHANGE - AN ANALOGY TO DIAGNOSTIC-TEST PERFORMANCE [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CENTOR, RM .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1986, 39 (11) :897-906
[7]   A VALIDATION OF THE FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASUREMENT AND ITS PERFORMANCE AMONG REHABILITATION INPATIENTS [J].
DODDS, TA ;
MARTIN, DP ;
STOLOV, WC ;
DEYO, RA .
ARCHIVES OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE AND REHABILITATION, 1993, 74 (05) :531-536
[8]  
FAGAN TJ, 1975, NEW ENGL J MED, V293, P257
[9]  
Granger C.V., 1986, TOP GERIATR REHABIL, V1, P59, DOI DOI 10.1097/00013614-198604000-00007
[10]  
GRESHAM GE, 1995, AHCPR PUBLICATION