Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic and climate forecast models in Northeastern Brazil

被引:30
作者
Kwon, Hyun-Han [1 ]
de Souza Filho, Francisco de Assis [2 ]
Block, Paul [3 ]
Sun, Liqiang [4 ]
Lall, Upmanu [5 ]
Reis, Dirceu S. [6 ]
机构
[1] Chonbuk Natl Univ, Dept Civil Engn, Jeonju 561756, Jeonbuk, South Korea
[2] Univ Fed Ceara, Dept Hydraul & Environm, Fortaleza, Ceara, Brazil
[3] Drexel Univ, Dept Civil Architectural & Environm Engn, Philadelphia, PA USA
[4] Columbia Univ, Int Res Inst Climate & Soc, New York, NY 10027 USA
[5] Columbia Univ, Dept Earth & Environm Engn, New York, NY 10027 USA
[6] Univ Brasilia, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, BR-70910900 Brasilia, DF, Brazil
来源
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES | 2012年 / 26卷 / 25期
基金
新加坡国家研究基金会;
关键词
streamflow forecast; climate forecast; hydrologic model; uncertainty; POTENTIAL EVAPOTRANSPIRATION INPUT; GENERAL-CIRCULATION MODEL; REGIONAL SPECTRAL MODEL; RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS; EL-NINO; PARAMETER OPTIMIZATION; STREAMFLOW SIMULATION; MULTIMODEL ENSEMBLES; PREDICTION SYSTEM; ALGORITHM;
D O I
10.1002/hyp.8433
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Seasonal streamflow forecasts based on climate information can guide water managers toward superior reservoir operations, leading to improved water resources management efficiency. Uncertainty, however, is always present in seasonal streamflow forecasts, affecting the forecast value. Thus, a forecast should not be considered complete without a description of its uncertainty, which is critical for climate risk and water resources management. This study investigates the uncertainties of a seasonal streamflow forecast system for Northeastern Brazil based on climate precipitation forecasts and hydrologic modeling. These two sources of uncertainty are treated independently and then compared in order to guide future investments in the forecast system. Sea surface temperature is considered to be the primary source of uncertainty for the seasonal precipitation forecasts, based upon a 10-member climate model ensemble. Parameter uncertainty is considered to be the only source of uncertainty for the hydrologic model. Estimation of parameter uncertainty is estimated by the Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm, which employs a Markov Chain Monte Carlo scheme to provide the posterior distribution of the parameters and form uncertainty bounds on streamflow forecasts. Results indicate that uncertainties associated with the climate forecast are much larger than those from parameter estimation in the hydrologic model. Although model structure has not been considered in the evaluation of hydrologic uncertainties, this study indicates that future efforts to address the predominant source of uncertainty should focus on the climate prediction models. Copyright (c) 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:3875 / 3885
页数:11
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, Bayesian Data Analysis
[2]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN GEOPHYS SOC
[3]  
Barnston AG, 1999, B AM METEOROL SOC, V80, P1829, DOI 10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<1829:NFOTEN>2.0.CO
[4]  
2
[5]  
BARNSTON AG, 1999, J CLIMATE, V80, P217
[6]  
Box G.E., 2011, Bayesian inference in statistical analysis
[7]   AN OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT OF SOIL-MOISTURE DEFICIT MODELS [J].
CALDER, IR ;
HARDING, RJ ;
ROSIER, PTW .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1983, 60 (1-4) :329-355
[8]   EXPERIMENTAL FORECASTS OF EL-NINO [J].
CANE, MA ;
ZEBIAK, SE ;
DOLAN, SC .
NATURE, 1986, 321 (6073) :827-832
[9]  
Carvalho TLL, 2008, P REG WAT RES C SALV
[10]  
CHOU MD, 1992, J ATMOS SCI, V49, P762, DOI 10.1175/1520-0469(1992)049<0762:ASRMFU>2.0.CO