Experimental characterization and analytical modelling of the mechanical behaviour of fused deposition processed parts made of ABS-M30

被引:262
作者
Croccolo, Dario [1 ]
De Agostinis, Massimiliano [1 ]
Olmi, Giorgio [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Ind Engn DIN, Bologna, Italy
关键词
Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM); Strength; Stiffness; Contouring; Analytical model; ORIENTATION; PARAMETERS; ABS;
D O I
10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.06.041
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The Fused Deposition Modelling process is a highly efficient Rapid Prototyping approach that makes it possible to rapidly generate even much complicated parts. Unfortunately, the Fused Deposition Modelling is affected by several parameters, whose setting may have a strong impact on the components strength. This paper is devoted to the study of the effects generated by the Fused Deposition Modelling production parameters on the tensile strength and on the stiffness of the generated components, tackling the question from both the experimental and the numerical points of view. For this purpose, an analytical model was developed, which is able to predict the strength and the stiffness properties, based on the number of contours deposited around the component edge and on the setting of the other main parameters of the deposition process. The fundamental result of the paper consists in the possibility of predicting the mechanical behaviour of the Fused Deposition modelled parts, once the raster pattern (dimensions, number of contours, raster angle) has been stated. The effectiveness of the theoretical model has been verified by comparison to a significant number of experimental results, with mean errors of about 4%. (C) 2013 Elsevier B. V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:506 / 518
页数:13
相关论文
共 10 条
[1]   Anisotropic material properties of fused deposition modeling ABS [J].
Ahn, SH ;
Montero, M ;
Odell, D ;
Roundy, S ;
Wright, PK .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 2002, 8 (04) :248-257
[2]   Critical parameters influencing the quality of prototypes in fused deposition modelling [J].
Anitha, R ;
Arunachalam, S ;
Radhakrishnan, P .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2001, 118 (1-3) :385-388
[3]  
ASTM International, 2010, D63810 ASTM INT
[4]  
Howell L.L., 2001, COMPLIANT MECH
[5]   Optimization of rapid prototyping parameters for production of flexible ABS object [J].
Lee, BH ;
Abdullah, J ;
Khan, ZA .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 169 (01) :54-61
[6]   Measurement of anisotropic compressive strength of rapid prototyping parts [J].
Lee, C. S. ;
Kim, S. G. ;
Kim, H. J. ;
Ahn, S. H. .
JOURNAL OF MATERIALS PROCESSING TECHNOLOGY, 2007, 187 (627-630) :627-630
[7]   A NEW LOADING-CONSTRAINING DEVICE FOR MECHANICAL TESTING WITH MISALIGNMENT AUTO-COMPENSATION [J].
Olmi, G. .
EXPERIMENTAL TECHNIQUES, 2011, 35 (06) :61-70
[8]   Parametric appraisal of mechanical property of fused deposition modelling processed parts [J].
Sood, Anoop Kumar ;
Ohdar, R. K. ;
Mahapatra, S. S. .
MATERIALS & DESIGN, 2010, 31 (01) :287-295
[9]   Optimum part deposition orientation in fused deposition modeling [J].
Thrimurthulu, K ;
Pandey, PM ;
Reddy, NV .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MACHINE TOOLS & MANUFACTURE, 2004, 44 (06) :585-594
[10]   Considerations and selection of optimal orientation for different rapid prototyping systems [J].
Xu, F. ;
Loh, H. T. ;
Wong, Y. S. .
RAPID PROTOTYPING JOURNAL, 1999, 5 (02) :54-60