EUS and/or EUS-guided FNA in patients with CT and/or magnetic resonance imaging findings of enlarged pancreatic head or dilated pancreatic duct with or without a dilated common bile duct

被引:65
作者
Agarwal, Banke [1 ]
Krishna, Naveen B. [1 ]
Labundy, Jennifer L. [1 ]
Safdar, Rizwan [1 ]
Akduman, Ece I. [1 ]
机构
[1] St Louis Univ, Sch Med, Div Gastroenterol & Hepatol, St Louis, MO 63110 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.gie.2008.01.026
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Incidental findings of an enlarged head of pancreas (HOP) or dilated pancreatic duct (PD) with or without a dilated common bile duct (CBD) on CT or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), in patients without obstructive jaundice, raise suspicion for a pancreatic neoplasm, but their clinical significance has not been established. Objective: To determine the prevalance of pancreatic neoplasm in this patient group. Design: Retrospective analysis of a prospective database. Setting: Tertiary-care university hospital. Patients: Patients without obstructive jaundice at initial presentation, who underwent EUS and/or EUS-guided FNA (EUS-FNA) for an abnormal CT and/or MRI with an enlarged HOP (n = 67) or a PD with or without a dilated CBD (n = 43). The final diagnosis was based on definitive cytology, surgical pathology, and clinical follow-up. Interventions: An EUS examination was performed by using a radial echoendoscopic followed by a linear echoendoscopic, if a focal pancreatic lesion was identified. Fine-needle aspirates were stained with Diff-Quik and Papanicolaou's methods, and were immediately assessed by an attending cytopathologist. Main Outcome Measurements: (1) The prevalence of pancreatic neoplasms and (2) performance characteristics of EUS-FNA for identifying malignant neoplasm, in this patient group. Results: In 110 study the final diagnosis included adenocarcinoma (n = 7), pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia (n = 1), neuroendocrine tumour (n = 1), tumour metastasis (n = 1), and benign cyst (n = 3). Thirty-two patients had EUS evidence of chronic pancreatitis, and, in the remaining 65 patients, the pancreas was normal. The accuracy of EUS and EUS-FNA for diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm in these patients was 99.1%, With 88.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity, 99% negative predicative value, and 100% positive predictive value. Limitation: A retrospective design and surgical confirmation in only a small number of study patients "Conclusion: A pancreatic neoplasm is seen in a clinically significant number of patients with "enlarged HOP" or "dilated PD with or without a dilated CBD" but without obstructive jaundice. EUS-FNA seems highly accurate for diagnosing pancreatic neoplasm in these patients.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 242
页数:6
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]   Endoscopic ultrasound after preoperative chemoradiation can help identify patients who benefit maximally after surgical esophageal resection [J].
Agarwal, B ;
Swisher, S ;
Ajani, J ;
Kelly, K ;
Fanning, C ;
Komaki, RR ;
Putnam, JB ;
Abu-Hamda, E ;
Molke, KL ;
Walsh, GL ;
Correa, AM ;
Ho, L ;
Liao, ZX ;
Lynch, PM ;
Rice, DC ;
Smythe, WR ;
Stevens, CW ;
Vaporciyan, AA ;
Yao, J ;
Roth, JA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (07) :1258-1266
[2]   Diagnosis of pancreatic cystic neoplasms: A report of the cooperative pancreatic cyst study [J].
Brugge, WR ;
Lewandrowski, K ;
Lee-Lewandrowski, E ;
Centeno, BA ;
Szydlo, T ;
Regan, S ;
del Castillo, CF ;
Warshaw, AL .
GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 126 (05) :1330-1336
[3]   Long-term follow-up of patients with clinically indeterminate suspicion of pancreatic cancer and normal EUS [J].
Catanzaro, A ;
Richardson, S ;
Veloso, H ;
Isenberg, GA ;
Wong, RCK ;
Sivak, MV ;
Chak, A .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 58 (06) :836-840
[4]   Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer [J].
DeWitt, J ;
Devereaux, B ;
Chriswell, M ;
McGreevy, K ;
Howard, T ;
Imperiale, TF ;
Ciaccia, D ;
Lane, KA ;
Maglinte, D ;
Kopecky, K ;
LeBlanc, J ;
McHenry, L ;
Madura, J ;
Aisen, A ;
Cramer, H ;
Cummings, O ;
Sherman, S .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2004, 141 (10) :753-763
[5]   Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of patients with suspected pancreatic cancer: Diagnostic accuracy and acute and 30-day complications [J].
Eloubeidi, MA ;
Chen, VK ;
Eltoum, IA ;
Jhala, D ;
Chhieng, DC ;
Jhala, N ;
Vickers, SM ;
Wilcox, CM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (12) :2663-2668
[6]   Time interval between abnormalities seen on CT and the clinical diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: Retrospective review of CT scans obtained before diagnosis [J].
Gangi, S ;
Fletcher, JG ;
Nathan, MA ;
Christensen, JA ;
Harmsen, WS ;
Crownhart, BS ;
Chari, ST .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2004, 182 (04) :897-903
[7]   A single-center experience of endoscopic ultrasonography for enlarged pancreas on computed tomography [J].
Ho, S ;
Bonasera, RJ ;
Pollack, BJ ;
Grendell, J ;
Feuerman, M ;
Gress, F .
CLINICAL GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2006, 4 (01) :98-103
[8]  
Hosoya T, 2000, Radiat Med, V18, P39
[9]   ASGE guideline: complications of EUS [J].
Jacobson, BC ;
Adler, DG ;
Davila, RE ;
Hirota, WK ;
Leighton, JA ;
Qureshi, WA ;
Rajan, E ;
Zuckerman, MJ ;
Fanelli, RD ;
Baron, TH ;
Faigel, DO .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2005, 61 (01) :8-12
[10]  
Kirchin Miles A, 2003, Top Magn Reson Imaging, V14, P426, DOI 10.1097/00002142-200310000-00007