Representation of Ecological Systems within the Protected Areas Network of the Continental United States

被引:104
作者
Aycrigg, Jocelyn L. [1 ]
Davidson, Anne [1 ]
Svancara, Leona K. [2 ]
Gergely, Kevin J. [3 ]
McKerrow, Alexa [4 ]
Scott, J. Michael
机构
[1] Univ Idaho, Dept Fish & Wildlife Sci, Natl Gap Anal Program, Moscow, ID 83843 USA
[2] Idaho Dept Fish & Game, Moscow, ID USA
[3] US Geol Survey, Gap Anal Program, Boise, ID USA
[4] US Geol Survey, Gap Anal Program, Raleigh, NC USA
来源
PLOS ONE | 2013年 / 8卷 / 01期
关键词
GAP ANALYSIS; CLIMATE-CHANGE; CONSERVATION; BIODIVERSITY; VEGETATION; WORLD; FRAMEWORK; COVERAGE; SCIENCE; REGIONS;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0054689
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
If conservation of biodiversity is the goal, then the protected areas network of the continental US may be one of our best conservation tools for safeguarding ecological systems (i.e., vegetation communities). We evaluated representation of ecological systems in the current protected areas network and found insufficient representation at three vegetation community levels within lower elevations and moderate to high productivity soils. We used national-level data for ecological systems and a protected areas database to explore alternative ways we might be able to increase representation of ecological systems within the continental US. By following one or more of these alternatives it may be possible to increase the representation of ecological systems in the protected areas network both quantitatively (from 10% up to 39%) and geographically and come closer to meeting the suggested Convention on Biological Diversity target of 17% for terrestrial areas. We used the Landscape Conservation Cooperative framework for regional analysis and found that increased conservation on some private and public lands may be important to the conservation of ecological systems in Western US, while increased public-private partnerships may be important in the conservation of ecological systems in Eastern US. We have not assessed the pros and cons of following the national or regional alternatives, but rather present them as possibilities that may be considered and evaluated as decisions are made to increase the representation of ecological systems in the protected areas network across their range of ecological, geographical, and geophysical occurrence in the continental US into the future.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 84 条
[1]  
Allred CS, 2007, 7675 TRANSF ADM JUR
[2]   Conserving the Stage: Climate Change and the Geophysical Underpinnings of Species Diversity [J].
Anderson, Mark G. ;
Ferree, Charles E. .
PLOS ONE, 2010, 5 (07)
[3]   Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation [J].
Ando, A ;
Camm, J ;
Polasky, S ;
Solow, A .
SCIENCE, 1998, 279 (5359) :2126-2128
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2006, National Elevation Dataset
[5]  
Baron J.S., 2008, Preliminary review of adaptation options for climate-sensitive ecosystems and resources. A report by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research
[6]  
Brooks TM, 2004, BIOSCIENCE, V54, P1081, DOI 10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[1081:CPBTGP]2.0.CO
[7]  
2
[8]  
Bunce RGH, 2012, ECOL INDIC
[9]   A GAP ANALYSIS OF THE MANAGEMENT STATUS OF THE VEGETATION OF IDAHO (USA) [J].
CAICCO, SL ;
SCOTT, JM ;
BUTTERFIELD, B ;
CSUTI, B .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 1995, 9 (03) :498-511
[10]  
Chape S., 2003, 2003 United Nations List of Protected Areas